The intelligent woman's guide to socialism and capitalismShaw, Bernard
General
The intelligent woman's guide to socialism and capitalism
Shaw, Bernard
Capitalism; Socialism
The opposition to the Factory Acts by the workers themselves was
actually harder to overcome in some ways than that of the employers,
because the employers, when they were forced by law to try the
experiment, found that extreme sweating, like killing the goose that
laid the golden eggs, was not the best way to make business pay, and
that they could more than make up for the cost of complying with
the very moderate requirements of the Acts by putting a little more
brains into their work. Even the stupid ones found that by speeding
up their machinery, and thus making their employees pull themselves
together and work harder, they could get more out of them in ten hours
than in twelve. The Intelligent Woman, if she has travelled, may have
noticed that in countries where there is no Shop Hours Act, and shops
remain open until everyone has gone to bed, the shopkeepers and their
assistants are far less tired and strained at nine in the evening than
the assistants in a big shop in a big English city are at five in the
afternoon, though the shop closes at six. Impossible as it may sound,
in the ginning mills of Bombay, before any factory legislation was
introduced, the children employed went into the factory, not for so
many hours a day, but for months at a time; and there are such things
in the world as Italian cafés that are open day and night without
regular night and day waiters, the employees taking a nap when and
where they can. And this lazy happy-go-lucky way of doing business may
do no great harm, whilst an eight hour day at high wages under modern
scientific management may mean work so intense that it takes the last
inch out of the workers, and cannot be done except by persons in the
prime of life, nor even by them for many consecutive months.
The employers had another resource in the introduction of machinery.
When employers can get plenty of cheap labor they will not introduce
machinery: it is too much trouble, and though the machine may do the
work of several persons it may cost more. At this moment (1925) in
Lisbon the very rough and dirty business of coaling steamships can be
done by machinery. The machinery is actually there ready for use. But
the work is done by women, because they are cheaper and there is no
law against it. If a Portuguese Factory Act were passed, forbidding
the employment of women, or imposing restrictions and regulations on
it (possibly not really for the sake of the women, but only to keep
them out of the job and thus reserve it for men), the machinery would
be turned on at once; and it would soon be improved and added to until
it became indispensable. But as the women would lose their employment,
they would object to any such Factory Act much more vociferously than
the employers.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account