The intelligent woman's guide to socialism and capitalismShaw, Bernard
General
The intelligent woman's guide to socialism and capitalism
Shaw, Bernard
Capitalism; Socialism
Then the employers tried what they could do for themselves. They
refused to employ unionists. This was no use: they could not get
enough non-unionist labor to go on with: and the unionists whom they
had to employ refused to work with non-unionists. Then the employers
refused to “recognize” the unions, which meant that they refused to
negotiate questions of wages with the secretaries of the unions, and
insisted on dealing with their employees directly and individually,
one at a time. This also failed. Making a separate bargain with each
employee is easy enough in the case of a woman engaging a domestic
servant or an oldfashioned merchant engaging a clerk or warehouseman;
but when men have to be taken on by the hundred, and sometimes by
the thousand, separate bargaining is impossible. The big employers
who talked about it at first really meant that there was to be no
bargaining at all. The men were to come in and just take what they
were told were the wages of the firm, and not presume to argue. The
moment the formation of the unions enabled the men to bargain, the big
employers, to save their own time, had to insist on its being done with
a single representative of the men who was experienced in bargaining
and qualified to discuss business: that is, with the secretary of the
Trade Union; so that all the fuss ended in the unions being not only
recognized by the big employers, but looked on as a necessary part of
their industry. Finally the unions were legalized; and here, as in the
case of the Married Women’s Property Acts, the change from outlawry to
legal protection went a little beyond the mark, in its reaction against
previous injustice, and gave the Trade Unions privileges and immunities
which are not enjoyed by ordinary societies. The employers then found
that they also must act together in dealing with the Trade Unions.
Accordingly, they formed unions of their own, called Employers’
Federations. The war of Capital with Labor is now a war of Trade Unions
with Employers’ Federations. Their battles, or rather blockades, are
lock-outs and strikes, lasting, like modern military battles, for
months.
Though some of the battles are about victimization (that is,
discharging an employee for actively advocating Trade Unionism, or
refusing to reinstate a prominent striker when the strike is over), all
the disputes in which ground is won or lost are about wages or hours of
work. You must understand that there are two sorts of wages: time wages
and piecework wages. Time wages are paid for the employee’s time by the
month, week, day, or hour, no matter how much or how little work may be
done during those periods. Piecework wages are paid according to the
work done: so much for each piece of work turned out.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account