The intelligent woman's guide to socialism and capitalismShaw, Bernard
General
The intelligent woman's guide to socialism and capitalism
Shaw, Bernard
Capitalism; Socialism
Also it has produced two and a half revolutions in political power,
by which the employers have overthrown the landed gentry, the
financiers have overthrown the employers, and the Trade Unions have
half overthrown the financiers. I shall explain this fully later on;
meanwhile, you have seen enough of its effects in the rise of the
Labor Party to take my word for it that politics will not stand still
any more than industry merely because millions of timid old-fashioned
people vote at every election for what they call Conservatism: that is,
for shutting our eyes and opening our mouths.
If King Alfred had been told that the time would come in England when
one idle family would have five big houses and a steam yacht to live
in whilst hard-working people were living six in a room, and half
starving at that, he would have said that God would never allow such
things to happen except in a very wicked nation. Well, we have left God
out of the question and allowed it to happen, not through wickedness,
but through letting things alone and fancying that they would let
themselves alone.
Have you noticed, by the way, that we no longer speak of letting things
alone in the old-fashioned way? We speak of letting them slide; and
this is a great advance in good sense; for it shews that we at last see
that they slide instead of staying put; and it implies that letting
them slide is a feckless sort of conduct. So you must rule out once for
all the notion of leaving things as they are in the expectation that
they will stay where they are. They wont. All we can do in that line
is to sit idly and wonder what will happen next. And this is not like
sitting on the bank of the stream waiting for the water to go by. It is
like sitting idly in a carriage when the horse is running away. You can
excuse it by saying “What else can I do?”; but your impotence will not
avert a smash. People in that predicament must all think hard of some
way of getting control of the horse, and meanwhile do all they can to
keep the carriage right side up and out of the ditch.
The policy of letting things alone, in the practical sense that the
Government should never interfere with business or go into business
itself, is called Laisser-faire by economists and politicians. It has
broken down so completely in practice that it is now discredited; but
it was all the fashion in politics a hundred years ago, and is still
influentially advocated by men of business and their backers who
naturally would like to be allowed to make money as they please without
regard to the interests of the public.
14
HOW MUCH IS ENOUGH?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account