The intelligent woman's guide to socialism and capitalismShaw, Bernard
General
The intelligent woman's guide to socialism and capitalism
Shaw, Bernard
Capitalism; Socialism
Perhaps you know some well-off families who do not seem to suffer from
their riches. They do not overeat themselves; they find occupations
to keep themselves in health; they do not worry about their position;
they put their money into safe investments and are content with a low
rate of interest; and they bring up their children to live simply and
do useful work. But this means that they do not live like rich people
at all, and might therefore just as well have ordinary incomes. The
general run of rich people do not know what to do with themselves; and
the end of it is that they have to join a round of social duties and
pleasures mostly manufactured by West End shopkeepers, and so tedious
that at the end of a fashionable season the rich are more worn out
than their servants and tradesmen. They may have no taste for sport;
but they are forced by their social position to go to the great race
meetings and ride to hounds. They may have no taste for music; but they
have to go to the Opera and to the fashionable concerts. They may not
dress as they please nor do what they please. Because they are rich
they must do what all the other rich people are doing, there being
nothing else for them to do except work, which would immediately reduce
them to the condition of ordinary people. So, as they cannot do what
they like, they must contrive to like what they do, and imagine that
they are having a splendid time of it when they are in fact being bored
by their amusements, humbugged by their doctors, pillaged by their
tradesmen, and forced to console themselves unamiably for being snubbed
by richer people by snubbing poorer people.
To escape this boredom, the able and energetic spirits go into
Parliament or into the diplomatic service or into the army, or manage
and develop their estates and investments instead of leaving them to
solicitors and stockbrokers and agents, or explore unknown countries
with great hardship and risk to themselves, with the result that their
lives are not different from the lives of the people who have to do
these things for a living. Thus riches are thrown away on them; and
if it were not for the continual dread of falling into poverty which
haunts us all at present they would refuse to be bothered with much
property. The only people who get any special satisfaction out of
being richer than others are those who enjoy being idle, and like to
fancy that they are better than their neighbors and be treated as if
they were. But no country can afford to pamper snobbery. Laziness
and vanity are not virtues to be encouraged: they are vices to be
suppressed. Besides, the desire to be idle and lazy and able to order
poor people about could not be satisfied, even if it were right to
satisfy it, if there were no poor people to order about. What we should
have would be, not poor people and rich people, but simply people with
enough and people with more than enough. And that brings up at last the
knotty question, what is enough?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account