The intelligent woman's guide to socialism and capitalismShaw, Bernard
General
The intelligent woman's guide to socialism and capitalism
Shaw, Bernard
Capitalism; Socialism
But beside this Spartan routine invented to employ people who have not
to work for their living, and which, you will notice, is a survival of
the old tribal order in which the braves hunted and fought whilst the
squaws did the domestic work, there is the necessary public work which
must be done by a governing class if it is to keep all political power
in its own hands. By not paying for this work, or paying so little for
it that nobody without an unearned income can afford to undertake it,
and by attaching to the upper division of the civil service examination
tests that only expensively educated persons can pass, this work is
kept in the hands of the rich. That is the explanation of the otherwise
unaccountable way in which the proprietary class has opposed every
attempt to attach sufficient salaries to parliamentary work to make
those who do it self-supporting, although the proprietors themselves
were the holders of the main parliamentary posts. Though they officered
the army, they did everything they could to make it impossible for an
officer to live on his pay. Though they contested every parliamentary
seat, they opposed the public payment of members of Parliament and
their election expenses. Though they regarded the diplomatic service as
a preserve for their younger sons, they attached to it the condition
that no youth should be eligible for it without a private income of
four hundred a year. They fought, and still fight, against making
government a self-supporting occupation, because the effect would be to
throw it open to the unpropertied, and destroy their own monopoly of it.
But as the work of government must be done, they must do it themselves
if they will not let other people do it. Consequently you find rich men
working in Parliament, in diplomacy, in the army, in the magistracy,
and on local public bodies, to say nothing of the management of their
own estates. Men so working cannot accurately be called the idle rich.
Unfortunately they do all this governing work with a bias in favour of
the privilege of their class to be idle. From the point of view of the
public good, it would be far better if they amused themselves like most
of their class, and left the work of governing to be done by well-paid
officials and ministers whose interests were those of the nation as a
whole.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account