The International Jew, the world's foremost problem [volume I] : $b being a reprint of a series of articles appearing in the Dearborn Independent from May 22 to October 2, 1920Ford, Henry
General
The International Jew, the world's foremost problem [volume I] : $b being a reprint of a series of articles appearing in the Dearborn Independent from May 22 to October 2, 1920
Ford, Henry
Antisemitic literature; Jews -- United States; United States -- Ethnic relations
The Protocols claim that the Gentiles are not thinkers, that attractive
ideas have been thrown at them so strategically and persistently that
the power of thought is almost destroyed out of them. Fortunately this
is a matter on which any Gentile may apply his own test. If he will
segregate his ruling ideas, especially those that center round the
thought of "democracy," he will discover that he is being ruled in his
mind by a whole company of ideas into whose authority over him he has
not inquired at all. He is ruled by "say so" whose origin he has not
traced. And when, pursuing those ideas, he finds that they are not
practicable, he is received by the explanation that "we are not yet
sufficiently advanced." Yet when he does see men who are sufficiently
"advanced" to put these very ideas into operation, he recoils from what
he sees them do, because he knows that "advancement" such as that is
deterioration--a form of disintegration. Yet every one of the ideas were
"good," "reasonable," "inspiring," "humane," to begin with. And, if this
Gentile will observe a little further, he will see that they are the
most persistently preached ideas in the world; he will also see who the
preachers are.
The Protocols distinctly declare that it is by means of the set of
ideals which cluster around "democracy," that their first victory over
public opinion was obtained. The idea is the weapon. And to be a weapon
it must be an idea at variance with the natural trend of life. It must
indeed be a theory opposed to the facts of life. And no theory so
opposed can be expected to take root and become the ruling factor,
unless it appeals to the mind as reasonable, inspiring and good. The
Truth frequently seems unreasonable; the Truth frequently is depressing;
the Truth sometimes seems to be evil; but it has this eternal advantage,
it is the Truth, and what is built thereon neither brings nor yields to
confusion.
This first step does not give the control of public opinion, but leads
up to it. It is worthy of note that it is the sowing of "the poison of
liberalism," as the Protocols name it, which comes first in order in
those documents. Then, following upon that, the Protocols say:
"To obtain control over public opinion it is first necessary to confuse
it."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account