The International Jew, the world's foremost problem [volume I] : $b being a reprint of a series of articles appearing in the Dearborn Independent from May 22 to October 2, 1920Ford, Henry
General
The International Jew, the world's foremost problem [volume I] : $b being a reprint of a series of articles appearing in the Dearborn Independent from May 22 to October 2, 1920
Ford, Henry
Antisemitic literature; Jews -- United States; United States -- Ethnic relations
This body was flanked by a similar body, which governed the religious
interests of the nation, the members being drawn apparently from classes
nearer the common people.
The Sanhedrin exercised authority not only over the Jews of Palestine,
but wherever they were scattered throughout the world. As a senate
exercising direct political authority, it ceased with the downfall of
the Jewish State in the year 70, but there are indications of its
continuance as an advisory body down to the fourth century.
In 1806, in order to satisfy the mind of Napoleon upon some questions
which had arisen concerning the Jews, an Assembly of Notables was
called, whose membership consisted of prominent Jews of France. They, in
turn, to bring the sanction of all Jewry to the answers which they
should give Napoleon, convoked the Sanhedrin. The Sanhedrin assembled in
Paris on February 9, 1807. It followed the prescribed ancient forms; it
was comprised of Jews from all parts of Europe; it was assembled to put
the whole authority of Jewry behind any compact the French Jews may have
been able to make with Napoleon.
In putting forth its decisions, this Sanhedrin of 1807 declared that it
was in all respects like the ancient Sanhedrin, "a legal assembly vested
with power of passing ordinances in order to promote the welfare of
Israel."
The significance of these facts is this: Whatever the leaders of the
Jews may do today in the way of maintaining the policy and constitution
of Israel, would not constitute a new departure. It would not signify a
new attitude. It would not be evidence of a new plan.
It would be entirely natural, Jewish solidarity being what it is, that
the Sanhedrin should still be continued. The ancient Sanhedrin appears
to have had a group of ten who were somewhat exalted in importance above
the rest; it would be perfectly natural if the leaders of the Jews were
today divided into committees, by countries or by objects.
There are always being held, year by year, world meetings of the
principal Jews of all lands. They come together whenever called, to the
disregard of everything else. Great judges from the high courts of the
various countries, international financiers, Jewish orators of the
"liberal type" who have the ear of the Gentiles, political maneuverers
from all the parties represented in the world, they assemble wherever
they will, and the subjects of their deliberations are made known only
to the extent they will. It is not to be supposed that all of the
attendants on these conventions are members of the inner circle. The
list of delegates will show scores of persons with whom no one would
associate Lord Reading and Judge Brandeis. If the modern Sanhedrin
meets, and it would be the most natural thing in the world if it should,
we may be sure it meets within the closed circle of those persons which
the Jewish aristocracy of money, intellect and power approves.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account