The International Monthly, Volume 2, No. 1, December, 1850Various
History
The International Monthly, Volume 2, No. 1, December, 1850
Various
Art, Modern -- 19th century -- Periodicals; Literature, Modern -- 19th century -- Periodicals; Science -- History -- Periodicals
more popular than in the East, where the jealous separation of the sexes
has, in all ages, been extreme. As little can it be said that Homer's
poems exhibit a state of society in which females were lightly esteemed.
The Trojan war itself originates in the susceptibility of an injured
husband: and all Greece takes up arms to avenge his wrong. The plot of
the Odyssey hinges mainly on the constant attachment of the hero to the
spouse of his youth; and the whole action tends to illustrate the high
degree of social and political influence consequent on the exemplary
performance of the duties of wife and mother. Nor surely do the
relations subsisting between Hector and Andromache, or Priam and Hecuba,
convey a mean impression of the respect paid to the female sex in the
heroic age. As little can the case be explained by a want of fit or
popular subjects of amorous adventure. Many of the favorite Greek
traditions are as well adapted to the plot of an epic poem or tragedy of
the sentimental order, as any that modern history can supply. Still less
can the exclusion be attributed to a want of sensibility, on the part of
the Greek nation, to the power of the tender passions. The influence of
those passions is at least as powerfully and brilliantly asserted in
their own proper sphere of poetical treatment, in the lyric odes, for
example, of Sappho or Mimnermus, as in any department of modern poetry.
Nor must it be supposed that even the nobler Epic or Tragic Muse was
insensible to the poetical value of the passion of love. But it was in
the connection of that passion with others of a sterner nature to which
it gives rise, jealousy, hatred, revenge, rather than in its own tender
sensibilities, that the Greek poets sought to concentrate the higher
interest of their public. Any excess of the amorous affections which
tended to enslave the judgment or reason was considered as a weakness,
not an honorable emotion; and hence was confined almost invariably to
women. The nobler sex are represented as comparatively indifferent,
often cruelly callous, to such influence; and, when subjected to it, are
usually held up as objects of contempt rather than admiration. As
examples may be cited the amours of Medea and Jason, of Phædra and
Hippolytus, of Theseus and Ariadne, of Hercules and Omphale. The satire
on the amorous weakness of the most illustrious of Greek heroes embodied
in the last mentioned fable, with the glory acquired by Ulysses from his
resistance to the fascinations of Circe and Calypso, may be jointly
contrasted with the subjection by Tasso of Rinaldo and his comrades to
the thraldom of Armida, and with the pride and pleasure which the
Italian poet of chivalry appears to take in the sensual degradation of
his heroes. The distinction here drawn by the ancients is the more
obvious, that their warriors are least of all men described as
indifferent to the pleasures of female intercourse. They are merely
exempt from subjection to its unmanly seductions.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account