The International Monthly, Volume 3, No. 3, June, 1851Various
History
The International Monthly, Volume 3, No. 3, June, 1851
Various
Art, Modern -- 19th century -- Periodicals; Literature, Modern -- 19th century -- Periodicals; Science -- History -- Periodicals
What followed the events related in our last number gave Ashburner a
lesson against making up his mind too hastily on any points of
character, national or individual. A fortnight after his arrival at
Oldport he would have said that the Americans were the most
communicative people he had ever fallen in with, and particularly,
that the men of "our set" were utterly incapable of keeping secret any
act or purpose of their lives, any thing that had happened, or was
going to happen. _Now_ he was surprised at the discretion shown by the
men cognizant of the late row (and they comprised all the fashionables
left in the place, and some of the outsiders, like Simpson); their
dexterity and careful management, first, to prevent the affair from
coming to a fight, and then, if that were impossible, to keep it from
publicity until the parties were safe over the border into Canada,
where they might "shoot each other like gentlemen," as a young
gentleman from Alabama expressed it. Sedley himself, whose
officiousness had precipitated the quarrel, did all in his power to
prevent any further mischief, and was as sedulous for the promotion of
_silencio_ and _misterio_, as if he had been leader of a chorus of
Venetian Senators. _The Sewer_ reporters, who, in their eagerness to
collect every bit of gossip and scandal, would have given the ears
which an outraged community had permitted them to retain for a
knowledge of the fracas and its probable consequences, never had the
least inkling of it. Indeed, so quietly was the whole managed, that
Ashburner never made out the cause of the old feud, nor was able to
form any opinion on the probability of its final issue. On the former
point he could only come to the conclusion from what he heard, that
Hunter had been mythologizing, as his wont was, something to Benson's
discredit several years before, and had been trying to make mischief
between him and some of his friends or relations; but what the exact
offence was, whether Sumner was involved in the quarrel from the
first, and if so, to what extent; and whether the legend about the
horse was a part of, or only an addition to the original
grievance;--on these particulars he remained in the dark. As to the
latter, he knew that Hunter had not challenged Benson, and that he had
left the place, but whether to look up a friend or not, no one seemed
to know, or if they did, no one cared to tell. At any rate, he did not
return for a week and more, during which time Ashburner had full
opportunity of studying the behavior and feelings of a man with a duel
in prospect.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account