The International Monthly, Volume 4, No. 2, September, 1851Various
History
The International Monthly, Volume 4, No. 2, September, 1851
Various
Art, Modern -- 19th century -- Periodicals; Literature, Modern -- 19th century -- Periodicals; Science -- History -- Periodicals
From this and other letters it is evident that Niepce had used iodine,
and abandoned it on account of the difficulty of reversing the lights
and shadows. Daguerre employed it also, and, as it appears, with far
more promise of success than any obtained by M. Niepce. On the fifth
of July, 1833, Niepce died; in 1837 Daguerre and Isodore Niepce, the
son and heir of Nicephore Niepce, entered into a definite agreement;
and in a letter written on the first November, 1837, to Daguerre,
Isodore Niepce says, "What a difference, also, between the method
which you employ and the one by which I toil on! While I require
almost a whole day to make one design, you ask only four minutes! What
an enormous advantage! It is so great, indeed, that no person, knowing
both methods, would employ the old one." From this time it is
established, that although both Niepce and Daguerre used iodine, the
latter alone employed it with any degree of success, and the discovery
of the use of mercurial vapor to produce the positive image clearly
belongs to Daguerre. In January, 1839, the Daguerreotype pictures were
first shown to the scientific and artistic public of Paris. The
sensation they created was great, and the highest hopes of its utility
were entertained. On the 15th June, M. Duchatel, Minister of the
Interior, presented a bill to the Chamber of Deputies relative to the
purchase of the process of M. Daguerre for fixing the images of the
camera. A commission appointed by the Chamber, consisting of Arago,
Etienne, Carl, Vatout, de Beaumont, Toursorer, Delessert (François),
Combarel de Leyval, and Vitet, made their report on the third of July,
and a special commission was appointed by the Chamber of Peers,
composed of the following peers: Barons Athalin, Besson, Gay Lussac,
the Marquis de Laplace, Vicomte Simeon, Baron Thenard, and the Comte
de Noe, who reported favorably on the thirtieth July, 1839, and
recommended unanimously that the "bill be adopted simply and without
alteration." On the nineteenth of August the secret was for the first
time publicly announced in the Institute by M. Arago, the English
patent having been completed a few days before, in open defiance and
contradiction of the statement of M. Duchatel to the Chamber of
Deputies, who used these words, "Unfortunately for the authors of this
beautiful discovery, it is impossible for them to bring their labor
into the market, and thus indemnify themselves for the sacrifices
incurred by so many attempts so long fruitless. This invention does
not admit of being secured by patent." In conclusion, the Minister of
the Interior said, "You will concur in a sentiment which has already
awakened universal sympathy; you will never suffer us to leave to
foreign nations the glory of endowing the world of science and of art
with one of the most wonderful discoveries that honor our native
land." Daguerre never did much towards the improvement of his process.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account