The Invasion of 1910, with a full account of the siege of LondonLe Queux, William
Science
The Invasion of 1910, with a full account of the siege of London
Le Queux, William
Great Britain -- Defenses; Imaginary wars and battles
“Last night, despite the hard fighting and the heavy losses we had
sustained, the promise of the morrow was distinctly a good one. But
now I have little heart with which to commence the difficult and
unpleasant task of chronicling the downfall of all our high hopes,
the repulse--ay, and the defeat--it is no use mincing matters--of
our heroic and sorely tried Army.
“Yes, our gallant soldiers have sustained a reverse which, but for
their stubborn fighting qualities and a somewhat inexplicable
holding back on the part of the Germans, might very easily have
culminated in disaster. Defeat although it undoubtedly is, the
darkness of the gloomy outlook is illuminated by the brilliancy of
the conduct of our troops.
“From General down to the youngest Volunteer drummer boy, our brave
soldiers did all, and more, than could be humanly expected of them,
and on none of them can be laid the blame of our ill-success. The
plan of attack is agreed on all hands to have been as good a one as
could have been evolved; the officers led well, their men fought
well, and there was no running short of ammunition at any period of
the engagement.
“‘Who, then, was responsible?’ it may well be asked. The answer is
simple. The British public, which, in its apathetic attitude
towards military efficiency, aided and abetted by the soothing
theories of the extremists of the ‘Blue Water’ school, had, as
usual, neglected to provide an Army fitted to cope in numbers and
efficiency with those of our Continental neighbours. Had we had a
sufficiency of troops, more especially of regular troops, there is
not the slightest doubt that the victory would have been ours. As
it was, our General was obliged to attack the enemy’s position with
a force whose numbers, even if they had been all regular soldiers,
were below those judged necessary by military experts for the task
in hand.
“Having broken through the German lines, success was in his grasp,
had he had sufficient reinforcements to have established him in the
position he had won and to beat back the inevitable counter-attack.
But it is best that I should continue my account of the fighting
from the point at which I closed my letter of yesterday. I had
arrived at the checking of our advance near Loddard’s Hill by the
blast of shrapnel from the German field batteries. It was plain
that the Volunteer Brigade, though it held its ground, could not
advance farther. But, unnoticed by them, the General had been
preparing for this eventuality.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account