The white Parian or Carrara marble is still lighter in color, to be
sure, and really is rather useful for pen and crayon work. But though in
part it is harder, on the whole it is much more porous and not so finely
grained as the Solenhofen stone, and therefore not at all available for
the intaglio method.
Since lithography began to arouse general interest, there have been
attempts to find a stone similar to the Solenhofen, and there has been
some fair success in France, Italy, England, and lately in the Kingdom
of Prussia. With the enormous masses of limestone which cover the
surface of the earth, it is not unlikely that this stone will be found
in many places, either in layers of plates one, two, or more inches
thick, or in great blocks which can be cut into plates.
In the Solenhofen stones one layer is not as good as another, and even
in the same layer there may be a decided difference. Therefore, if one
would produce perfectly beautiful work, it is necessary to obtain
selected and perfect stones. This should be stipulated beforehand with
the quarrymen, who now know pretty well how the best stones should be
constituted.
A good stone must have the following properties:--
(1) _The proper thickness._ Thickness must be proportionate to the size.
Smaller plates will resist the pressure of printing even if they are not
so thick as the larger ones must be. But it is best to buy no stone less
than one and one half or more than three and one half inches thick,
because the thinner ones will not bear frequent grinding and the thicker
ones are too heavy and inconvenient, besides taking up too much room.
The best thickness of a stone is two to two and one half inches.
(2) _Good mass._ There are soft and hard stones. Sometimes the same
stone is hard above and soft underneath, or the reverse. Often, also, a
stone may consist of several thin and unequal layers. In the latter
case, if the union is good and the layers are not easily separated, it
will make no difference, so long as the stone is good in other respects.
On the whole, however, it may be assumed that the harder stones are the
best for all methods, so long as their mass is entirely uniform and they
are not marred, as is the case with many, with white dots and patches.
Then, to be sure, they are not worth much for any process, and at best
can be used only for pen designs or for such of the intaglio processes
where the lines need no particular sharpness. Such stones, generally
gray, very hard, with softer, somewhat lighter patches or specks, are
very hard to grind evenly because the softer parts are most powerfully
attacked by the grinding material and become depressed. This produces
the following defects:--
(_a_) In pen work, the pen will catch often, whenever it comes to such a
place. This, however, is not so important: but
(_b_) In the crayon method there will be defects and lights in the
shadings on the softer places, which are very hard to correct.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account