The Invention of Printing.: A Collection of Facts and Opinions, Descriptive of Early Prints and Playing Cards, the Block-Books of the Fifteenth Century, the Legend of Lourens Janszoon Coster, of Haarlem, and the Work of John Gutenberg and His AssociatesDe Vinne, Theodore Low
History
The Invention of Printing.: A Collection of Facts and Opinions, Descriptive of Early Prints and Playing Cards, the Block-Books of the Fifteenth Century, the Legend of Lourens Janszoon Coster, of Haarlem, and the Work of John Gutenberg and His Associates
De Vinne, Theodore Low
Incunabula -- Bibliography; Printing -- History -- Origin and antecedents
But, in the year 1760, Daniel Schoepflin, an eminent scholar of
Strasburg, wrote a valuable contribution to the history of typography,
under the title of _Vindiciæ Typographicæ_. Meerman was provoked to
emulation. He had not believed in the legend, but he thought that
he could construct a theory of the invention, which would, to some
extent, concede the claims of the rival cities of Haarlem, Strasburg
and Mentz. In this illogical manner, by the construction of a theory
before [p354] he was in possession of the facts, he began to write the
_Origines Typographicæ_. The entire book was published in 1765, with a
portrait of Lourens Coster by the eminent Dutch engraver Houbraken, and
a portrait of Meerman himself by Daullé. In the matter of scholarship,
Meerman was thoroughly qualified for his task. He wrote in a clear
style and with admirable method. But he knew nothing of the mechanics
of printing nor of type-founding, and, unfortunately, he was too
conceited to accept correction or instruction even from the hands of
experts like Enschedé, Fournier and others. In trying to make facts
suit theories, he went so far as to order the engraver of a fac-simile
to stretch the vellum of a _Donatus_ so that the types used upon this
_Donatus_ should appear to be the same as the types of the _Speculum_.
[Illustration: Medals in Honor of Coster.
[From Seiz.]]
These are the conclusions submitted by Meerman as the result of his
study of, and reflection on, the legend of Haarlem:
Typography was invented by Louwerijs Janszoen, also known as Laurens
Coster, who, at various times between 1422 and 1434, filled the office
of sheriff, treasurer and sacristan. He was of noble blood, but a
bastard of one of the [p355] Brederodes. He died sometime between
1434 and 1440. He invented typography about 1428 or 1430, using only
movable types of wood. All that Junius has written about an invention
of lead and tin types by Coster is incorrect. He thinks it useless
to consider the engraving of letters upon solid wood-blocks, for
this is not typography, and is not printing as we now understand it.
Laurens was robbed on Christmas night, 1440, by Johan Gensfleisch
the elder, who carried the art to Mentz. The son-in-law and heirs
of Coster continued his business for some time after his death, but
with little appreciation, as they were overshadowed by the superior
invention of Gutenberg and Schœffer. Coster printed but one edition of
the _Speculum_ from types of wood. His successors printed the other
Dutch edition and the two Latin editions from engraved metal types.
The contributions of different inventors toward the perfect invention
are acknowledged in this manner: Laurens Coster was the first to
demonstrate the feasibility of typography by his use of wood types;
John Gensfleisch was the first to make cut or engraved metal types;
Peter Schoeffer was the inventor of cast or founded metal types; John
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account