The Invention of Printing.: A Collection of Facts and Opinions, Descriptive of Early Prints and Playing Cards, the Block-Books of the Fifteenth Century, the Legend of Lourens Janszoon Coster, of Haarlem, and the Work of John Gutenberg and His AssociatesDe Vinne, Theodore Low
History
The Invention of Printing.: A Collection of Facts and Opinions, Descriptive of Early Prints and Playing Cards, the Block-Books of the Fifteenth Century, the Legend of Lourens Janszoon Coster, of Haarlem, and the Work of John Gutenberg and His Associates
De Vinne, Theodore Low
Incunabula -- Bibliography; Printing -- History -- Origin and antecedents
Considered from a mechanical point of view, the merit of Gutenberg’s
invention may be inferred from its permanency. His type-mould was
not merely the first; it is the only practical mechanism for making
types. For more than four hundred years this mould has been under
critical examination, and many attempts have been made to supplant
it. Contrivances have been invented for casting fifty or more types
at one operation; for swaging types, like nails, out of cold metal;
for stamping types from cylindrical steel dies upon the ends of thin
copper rods—but experience has shown that these and like inventions
in the department of type-making machinery are impracticable. There
is no better method than Gutenberg’s. Modern type-casting machines
have moulds attached to them which are more exact and more carefully
finished, and which have many little attachments of which Gutenberg
never dreamed, but in principle and in all the more important features,
the modern moulds may be regarded as the moulds of Gutenberg.
Gutenberg’s merit as an original inventor, although never properly
recognized during his life, was never denied. But this merit was
disallowed and set aside after his death by the sons and friends of
Peter Schœffer. They said that printing was only half invented by
Gutenberg, and that the complete invention is really due to Gutenberg’s
assistant and successor. As this claim has been repeated by many
authors, it is necessary, for the vindication of Gutenberg, to review
the work and workmanship of Peter Schœffer and John Fust.
[p449]
XXIII
The Work of Peter Schœffer and John Fust.
Schœffer a Copyist at Paris in 1449 . . . Fac-simile of his Writing
. . . Enters the Service of Gutenberg . . . Psalter of 1457, with
Fac-simile of Types and Initials in Colors . . . Accurate Register of
Initial made by Painting the Cut . . . Evidences of Painting . . .
Fac-simile of Colophon in Colors . . . Different Theories concerning
the Method of Printing . . . Schœffer’s First Claim as an Inventor
. . . Psalter probably Planned by Gutenberg . . . Fac-similes of
the Types of the Rationale Durandi and of the Bible of 1462 . . .
Trade-Mark of Fust and Schœffer . . . Fac-simile of the Types of the
Constitutions . . . Jenson’s Mission to Mentz . . . Printing not a
Secret . . . Death of Fust . . . Partnership of Schœffer and Conrad
Fust . . . Fac-simile of Types of 1468 . . . Schœffer becomes a Judge
. . . Schœffer’s Claim to the Invention of Matrices . . . Statements
of John Schœffer and of Trithemius . . . Their Improbability . . .
Statement of Jo. Frid. Faustus . . . Its Untrustworthiness.
* * * * *
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account