The Invention of Printing.: A Collection of Facts and Opinions, Descriptive of Early Prints and Playing Cards, the Block-Books of the Fifteenth Century, the Legend of Lourens Janszoon Coster, of Haarlem, and the Work of John Gutenberg and His AssociatesDe Vinne, Theodore Low
History
The Invention of Printing.: A Collection of Facts and Opinions, Descriptive of Early Prints and Playing Cards, the Block-Books of the Fifteenth Century, the Legend of Lourens Janszoon Coster, of Haarlem, and the Work of John Gutenberg and His Associates
De Vinne, Theodore Low
Incunabula -- Bibliography; Printing -- History -- Origin and antecedents
been a novelty, for we have many evidences that it was practised in
Italy before Marco Polo was born. The mechanics of Europe had nothing
to learn of the theory, and but little of the practice, of the art of
xylography. All they needed was something to print, and something to
print on. They were waiting for paper and for playing cards.
[p122]
VII
The Early Printing of Italy.
Printing with Ink in Italy during the Twelfth Century . . . Printed
Initials in Manuscripts . . . Printed Signatures and Monograms,
with Illustrations . . . Medieval Trade-Marks, with Illustrations
. . . Engraved Initials probably made by Copyists who could not draw
. . . Texts of Books printed from Engraved Letters . . . The Codex
Argenteus of Sweden . . . Weigel’s Fac-Similes of Printing on Silk and
Linen Cloth . . . Probable Method of Printing . . . Printed Fabrics
made in Spain, Sicily and Italy . . . Art not derived from China
. . . Antiquity of Stained Cloths . . . No Connecting Link between
Hand-Stamping and Card-Printing . . . No Early Italian Image Prints
. . . Story about the Two Cunios . . . Its Improbability . . . No
Early Notices of Engraving on Wood . . . Not considered a New Art,
nor a Great Art . . . Its Productions of Paltry Nature . . . Early
Engravers had nothing to print on.
* * * * *
Nor is it any proof or strong argument against the antiquity of
printing, that authentic specimens of wood engraving of those early
times are not to be found. Their merits as works of art were not such
as to render their preservation at all probable.
_Ottley._
* * * * *
At the beginning of the seventeenth century, a student of old Italian
books called the attention of bibliographers to the strange uniformity
of the initial letters in many old manuscripts,[49] some of which
had been made as early as the ninth century. Each ornamental letter,
wherever found or however often repeated in the same book, was of
the same form. He reached the conclusion that this uniformity had
been produced by engraved stamps. The announcement of this discovery
induced other persons to make similar examinations, the result of which
confirmed the original statement. [p123] It was proved that there was
a uniformity in the shapes of the letters which could not have been
made by drawing.
[Illustration:
The Mark of The Mark of
Jacobus Arnoldus, 1345. Johannes Meynersen, 1435.
[From Jackson.] [From Jackson.]]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account