The Irish Guards in the Great War, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b The First BattalionKipling, Rudyard
History
The Irish Guards in the Great War, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b The First Battalion
Kipling, Rudyard
Great Britain. Army. Irish Guards -- History; World War, 1914-1918 -- Regimental histories -- Great Britain
On the 28th July the Battalion, after various contradictory orders,
was sent forward in the evening to relieve the left of the 3rd
Coldstream in the outpost-line. There was a report that the enemy
meditated an attack on that Battalion at their junction with the
Thirty-eighth Division on their right. (It must be remembered that
the French, who had had some difficulty in getting their guns
forward, were not in place, and their First Division lay on the left
of the Guards.) Up, then, went the Battalion in the evening and
took over the outpost-line from Douteuse House, to where it joined
the French forces. Two platoons of No. 2 Company, under Captain R.
Rodakowski, crossed the canal in the mud on improvised bridges of
slabs of wood nailed across rabbit-wire and canvas, and lay up in
an old German front line. The other two platoons occupied the old
British front line on the canal bank. Battalion Headquarters and
aid-post were at the Château, as usual. No. 1 Company (Captain W.
C. Mumford, M.C.) in support, and No. 4 Company (Captain Law, M.C.)
had a couple of platoons forward and two back. They were all shelled
equally through that night with gas and lachrymal shells, _plus_
barrages on headquarters and the various lines of support. The gas
was responsible for six casualties, chiefly among signallers and
orderlies, whose work kept them on the move. Nothing could be done to
strengthen the newly occupied trenches, as there was no wire on the
spot; for the R.E. parties, trying to bring it up, were pinned till
daylight by back-barrages.
On the 29th July a patrol was sent out to look at a concrete
blockhouse which our artillery reported they were unable to destroy
with the guns that were in use at the moment. The patrol drew fire
from the blockhouse, went on into the dark, and found that the
enemy’s line behind it was held by small posts only. Returning, it
would seem that they were fired at again, an N.C.O. and a man being
wounded, but they wounded and captured a prisoner, who said that
the post held twenty men. Whereupon that blockhouse was “kept under
observation” by small parties of our men, under Lieutenant Budd, M.C.
Next morning they observed five or six of the enemy lying out in
shell-holes round the blockhouse, which was too small for the whole
of its garrison. This overflow was all sniped in due course, till
the blockhouse, with fourteen unwounded prisoners, surrendered, was
absorbed into our outpost-line, and held against the enemy’s fire.
Considering that fire at the time--which included 5.9’s, 4.2’s, and
.77’s--it was a neatly expeditious affair. The Battalion was relieved
by the 1st Grenadiers and the Welsh, and went back to camp in the
Forest area to spend the 30th July preparing themselves and their
souls for the morrow’s work.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account