The Iroquois; or, the bright side of Indian characterJohnson, Anna C. (Anna Cummings)
History
The Iroquois; or, the bright side of Indian character
Johnson, Anna C. (Anna Cummings)
Iroquois Indians -- Social life and customs
proves unhappy, the parties are allowed to separate, and each is at
liberty to marry again. But the mother has the sole right to the
disposal of the children. She keeps them all if she chooses, and to
their father they are ever mere strangers.
In regard to property, too, the wife retains whatever belonged to her
before marriage, distinct from her husband, and can dispose of it as
she pleases without his consent, and if she separates from him, takes
it with her, and at her death, either before or after separation, her
children inherit all she possessed.
A white man was once remonstrating with an Indian upon allowing the
matrimonial bond to be so lightly broken, when the Indian replied: “You
marry squaw, she know you always keep her, so she scold, scold, scold,
and not cook your venison. I marry squaw, and she know I leave her if
she not good. So she not scold, but cook my venison, and always
pleasant, we live long together.”
There were few penalties for any species of crime. To call a thing bad
was usually sufficient in Indian communities to deter from all that
they considered evil. That which we denounce as criminal, was not
called so by them.
The staid and burly Englishman, never mingled with the Indians in a way
to gain their confidence or learn their true character. Their way of
life was repulsive to him, but the Frenchman could become a hunter and
roam for years in the forests, or live in a wigwam, and conform in all
things to Indian customs with the same nonchalance as he could walk
upon tapestry and recline upon divans. This is the reason we usually
have so much more pleasing pictures of Indian life from French than
English traders. Englishmen would not be very likely to become the
confidants of hunters or warriors, or to have an opportunity to listen
to the love songs of Indian maidens.
It is certainly wonderful that a people who knew nothing of physiology,
and had no learned treatises upon physical degeneracy, should have so
thoroughly provided against deterioration by laws concerning
intermarriage. Their wigwams were built for the convenience of several
families. A lodge was constructed, and when it became necessary,
additions were made till it became one or two hundred feet in length,
and the abode of a little multitude, but all who occupied it were
within the degrees of consanguinity which forbade marriage—they were
brothers and sisters, and treated each other as such. But disputing and
wrangling form no part of the nurseries of an Indian cabin. It is quite
amazing how many will live together in harmony and love.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account