It is superfluous to define the motives which would
not allow England to see Egypt in the possession of a
rival nation without opposing it by the most energetic
resistance; but what should also be taken into serious
consideration, is, that with less positive interests,
France under the dominion of her glorious traditions,
under the impression of other feelings more instinctive
than rational, and therefore more powerful over the
impressionable spirit of her inhabitants, would not, in
her turn, leave to England the peaceable sovereignty of
Egypt. It is clear that, so long as the route to India is
open and certain, that the state of the country ensures
the facility and promptitude of the communications,
England will not set about creating the most grave
difficulties by appropriating a territory which, in her
eyes, has no other value than as a means of transit.
It is likewise evident that France—whose policy, for
the last fifty years, has been to contribute to the
prosperity of Egypt, both by her counsels and by the
concourse of a great number of Frenchmen distinguished
in the sciences, in administrative capacity, in all the
arts of peace or war—will not seek to realize, in this
direction, the projects of another epoch, so long as
England does not interfere.
But let one of those crises occur which have so often
shaken the East, let a circumstance arise wherein England
should find herself under the rigorous necessity of
taking a position in Egypt to prevent another power from
forestalling her, and tell us then if it is possible that
the alliance could survive the complications which such
an event would occasion. And why should England consider
herself obliged to become mistress of Egypt, even at
the risk of breaking her alliance with France? For this
single reason, that Egypt is the shortest and most direct
route from England to her Eastern possessions; that
this route must be constantly open to her; and that,
in whatever concerns this mighty interest, she could
never temporise. Thus, from the position given to her
by nature, Egypt might still become the subject of a
conflict between France and Great Britain; so that this
chance of rupture would disappear if, by a providential
event, the geographical conditions of the ancient world
were changed, and, that the commercial route to India,
instead of passing through the heart of Egypt, were
removed to its confines, and, being opened to all the
world, could never be exposed to the chance of its
becoming the exclusive privilege of any one.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account