May one dwell upon so simple a thing as a small family dinner-party? It
is generally undramatic and uneventful: it is not generally marked even
by a new dish or a bottle of rare wine. Yet there lingers in the mind of
every man the recollection of pleasant dinners. I should like to write a
Book of Dinners--not a book for the _gourmet_, but a book of memories.
It might be a most delightful volume. There would be in it the
school-boys' dinner. I remember a certain dinner at eighteenpence a
head, at Richmond, before we had the row in the boat, when we quarrelled
and broke the oars over each other's heads, and very nearly capsized: a
certain undergraduates' dinner, in which four men--three of whom are now
ghosts--joined: the Ramblers' dinner, of lamb chops and bottled ale and
mirth and merriment: the two-by-two dinner in the private room, a dainty
dinner of sweet lamb, sweet bread, sweet peas, sweet looks, sweet
Moselle, and sweet words. Is it really true that one never--never--gets
young again? Some people do, I am sure, but they are under promise to
say nothing about it. I shall--and then that dinner may perhaps--one
cannot say--one never knows--and I suppose--if one was young again--that
they would be found just as pretty as they ever were. There is the
official dinner, stately and cold: the city dinner, which generally
comes to a man when his digestion is no longer what it was: the family
dinner, in which the intellect plays so small a part, because no one
wastes his fine things on his brothers and sisters: the dinner at which
one has to make a speech. Indeed, this Book of Dinners promises to be a
most charming volume. I should attempt it, however, with trembling,
because, to do it really well, one should be, first of all, a scholar,
if only to appreciate things said and spoken, and in order to connect
the illustrious past with food and drink. Next, he ought to be still
young: he certainly must have a proper feeling for wine, and must
certainly understand when and why one should be grateful to good Master
Cook: he should be a past or present master in the Art of Love and a
squire of Dames: he should be good at conversation: he must, in the old
language, be a worshipper of Bacchus, Venus, Phoebus Apollo, the Muses
nine and the Graces three. He must be no poor weakling, unable to enjoy
the good creatures of flesh, fowl, fish, and wine: no boor: and no log
insensible to loveliness.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account