The ivory king : $b A popular history of the elephant and its alliesHolder, Charles Frederick
History
The ivory king : $b A popular history of the elephant and its allies
Holder, Charles Frederick
Elephants
Four years later the Romans had become perfectly familiar with elephant
warfare; and Curius Dentalus organized his men especially to demoralize
the elephants, ordering them to attack the animals with burning torches
in one hand, and sharp swords in the other. This plan was successful,
and was aided by an unforeseen accident. An elephant calf accompanied
its mother upon the field of battle; and, becoming wounded early in the
fight, its roars so enraged its mother, and demoralized the others, that
they charged, and threw the troops of Pyrrhus into complete disorder.
They were finally captured by the Romans, and four led in triumph to
Rome,—the first ever taken there.
To show what vague notions of the elephant the Romans had, they called
the great creatures Lucanian oxen; and, according to Pliny, the Roman
writers, in general, gave them this name, probably because they first saw
them in Lucania.
King Pyrrhus was extremely unfortunate in the management of his
elephants. At the siege of Argos, when his men had battered in the gates
of the town, the mahouts lost control of the beasts in the excitement,
and they attempted to rush through the low gates; but the tall towers
struck them, and forced them back in great disorder, and many of
their own soldiers and masters were trampled under foot, and killed.
In describing this event, Plutarch relates that one of the elephants
exhibited remarkable courage and affection for its rider; keeping a large
number of enemies at bay when its master was dismounted, finally taking
him in its trunk, and removing him to a place of safety. The animal
doubtless received some instruction from its master.
The old writers were fond of accrediting to the elephant many more
virtues, courage, generosity, and self-sacrifice, than they seem to
possess to-day; and, undoubtedly, they often gave the animals credit for
spontaneous actions, when they were really obeying a command of their
mahout, or driver. I have referred particularly to this and the opinions
of Sanderson in the chapter devoted to the intelligence of the elephant.
Plutarch and Ælian both record the story of an elephant of Porus that
drew darts from its master’s body. Such may have been the case; but I
think, if true, it was at the direct order of Porus, and not actuated by
compassion, as the old authors would have us believe.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account