The Jacobite Rebellions (1689-1746): (Bell's Scottish History Source Books.)Thomson, J. Pringle (James Pringle)
History
The Jacobite Rebellions (1689-1746): (Bell's Scottish History Source Books.)
Thomson, J. Pringle (James Pringle)
Jacobites; Scotland -- History -- Sources
When the Prince join'd the body of the army a Council of War was held,
in which it was debated whether the army should march in a body to
Inverness by Aberdeen or take the Highland road, by which the chiefs
could, with the greater ease, get such of their men to rejoin them as
had gone home with plunder after the battle of Falkirk, which would
considerably increase their army. The low-country men were of the former
opinion, the Highlanders of the latter. It was put to the vote, and the
latter carried it by a great majority. However, the Prince was positive
for the Aberdeen road, with which Lochiel complied. But Cluny, going
out, met Mr. Murray, and told him it was surprizing the Prince should be
so positive in a thing contrary to reason and his own instinct,
especially when a great majority of the Council of War were of another
opinion. His expressing himself with a little warmth made Mr. Murray
speak to Sir Thomas Sheridan, who went to the Prince and prevailed upon
him to agree with what had been the opinion of the Council of War. He
marched with the Highlanders the Highland road by Ruthven in Badenoch,
to Inverness, where it was resolved to attack Fort Augustus and Fort
William. Of either I can give no distinct account, but that the first
was taken, and the siege of the other deserted.
Earl Cromertie and others were sent to different countries to cover the
rising of some and prevent that of others. This weakened the army, and
tho' many joined the day before the battle of Culloden, a great number
did not. Earl of Cromertie, tho' many expresses were sent to order his
returning to Inverness, in place of doing as commanded, was surprized
and taken prisoner; and these that did join were much fatigued. None had
got pay after they left Tay bridge in their march north, and they were
straightened in provisions for some days before the battle. Cumberland's
army was not opposed in passing the Spey, tho' a considerable force had
been sent there for that end.[101] The Prince was in danger of being
taken at MacIntosh's house, and his safety was chiefly owing to a
mistake of Earl of Loudon's men.
FOOTNOTES:
[101] This is incorrect.
J. THE EVE OF CULLODEN (APRIL, 1746).
+Source.+--_Memoirs of Sir Robert Strange, Knight, and of his
Brother-in-Law, Andrew Lumisden, Private Secretary to the Stuart
Princes_, vol. i., p. 54, by James Dennistoun, of Dennistoun.
(London: 1855.)
Such was the position of my undertaking[102] when, all of a sudden, news
was brought to Inverness that the Duke of Cumberland, with his army, had
passed the Spey on the 13th of April. The town was in a general alarm,
and even in confusion. Nothing was heard but the noise of bagpipes, the
beating of drums, and the clash of arms. The field of Culloden was the
following day to be the general rendezvous, and every individual betook
himself to his corps.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account