The Jesuit Relations and Allied Documents, Vol. 4: Acadia and Quebec, 1616-1629
History
The Jesuit Relations and Allied Documents, Vol. 4: Acadia and Quebec, 1616-1629
Canada -- History -- To 1763 (New France); Indians of North America -- Canada; Jesuits -- Missions; Jesuits -- North America
It is necessary, in this connection, to outline the commercial
monopolies that successively dominated New France in its infancy. For
an account of the first of these, granted to De Monts, see vol. i.,
_note_ 2. His patent was finally canceled in 1609; and in January,
1611, he gave up his claims in America to Madame de Guercheville.
Meanwhile, Champlain (see vol. ii., _note_ 42) was continued as
lieutenant of the King in New France, with personal command over the
Quebec colony, which was sustained mainly through his efforts, with the
aid of the Rouen merchants who had been associated with De Monts.
_Company of Associates._--The Rouen associates withdrew from the
enterprise, toward the close of 1611; and, in the following year,
Champlain undertook the formation of a new company, to be composed of
merchants from Rouen, Havre, St. Malo and La Rochelle. It was open to
all who were willing to share both the profits and the losses, thus
avoiding the jealousies that had been aroused against the limited
membership of De Monts's company. The Rochelle men finally declined
to enter the company, which afterwards lost heavily by the illicit
trade in which the former engaged with the savages. Champlain also
accuses these merchants of selling arms and ammunition to the natives,
and exciting their hostility against the Quebec colonists.--See his
_Voyages_ (1632), part 2, pp. 2, 3. The Count de Soissons (vol. ii,
of this series, _note_ 24) was appointed governor of New France, with
Champlain as his lieutenant. After considerable delay, the Company of
Associates was organized (1613-14); among its members were, besides De
Monts and Champlain, Thomas Porée, Lucas Legendre, Mathieu Dusterlo,
and Daniel Boyer. Quarrels arose among the associates, caused by
commercial and even religious differences of opinion; and some of
them tried to eject Champlain from his command. Although this attempt
failed, his work was greatly hindered and embarrassed, until the Duke
of Montmorency, Condé's successor as viceroy, came to his aid (1620).
_Company of De Caen._--Dissensions and complaints still arising,
the Company of Associates was summarily dissolved by Montmorency,
in November, 1620, and a new company formed. At its head were the
De Caens; there were, also, Guillaume Robin, Jacques de Troyes, and
François Hervé, merchants; François de Troyes, chief of royal finance
at Orléans; Claude Le Ragois, receiver-general of finance at Limoges;
Pierre de Verton, counselor and secretary of the King; and others. The
old company had resented Montmorency's order of dissolution; but within
a year its membership and interests were consolidated with those of
the new association. The latter received a monopoly for eleven years,
to which the King added eleven more; but it also was dissolved by
Richelieu, early in 1627, to make room for his "Company of New France,"
also known as the "Company of the Hundred Associates."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account