The Jew, The Gypsy and El IslamBurton, Richard Francis, Sir
Islamic
The Jew, The Gypsy and El Islam
Burton, Richard Francis, Sir
Islam; Jews; Romanies
In support of this opinion it may be observed that this religion--if
indeed Fetissism merit that sacred name--in its earliest form contains
no traces of a Godhead or a Creator.[211] It is a systematic worship
of the personified elements, productions, and powers of Nature, male
and female, and supported by a host of associates and subordinates.
Its triad is Indra, the Æther-god; Varuna ([Greek: ουρανος: ouranos]),
the Sun-god; and Agni, the Fire-god. The polytheistic triad of the
Puranas being then unknown, the Creator, Brahma, appears in the Vedas;
the Preserver, Vishnu, inferior to Indra, represents the firmament;
and Siwa is proved by Lassen to have been a local god, subsequently
admitted by the Brahmans into their vast Pantheon. Still further from
man’s belief in those early days is the bold and original thought
of the Upanashids and Vedantas, destined so soon to fall before the
formulæ of the schools and law-books, the Puranas and other traditions.
There Brahm, or the One Almighty, is made the pinnacle of the gorgeous
pagoda of belief; the whole universe, matter and spirit, is represented
to be the very substance and development of the Demiurgos. In support
of their grand Pantheism the Brahma-Sutra declares the human soul to
be a portion of the Deity--_divinæ particula auræ_--“the relation not
being that of master and servant, but that of the whole and part.”
Creation was assumed to be the extension of the Creator’s essence,
as the mathematical point produces by its increase length, depth,
and breadth by endowing empty space with the properties of figure.
From this refined and metaphysical dogma, this theoretical emanation
of being from, and its corollary, refusion into, the Soul of the
World, springs the doctrine of Metempsychosis, “implying belief in
an after-state of rewards and punishments and a moral government of
creation.” The votary of Hinduism has now progressed so far as to
symbolize the vulgar idolatry of the people. Beneficent animals are
explained as symbols of Brahma’s creative and Vishnu’s preserving
functions; wild and ferocious beasts are typified as the Deity’s
destroying power. They revere men of splendid abilities and glorious
actions as having more of the divine essence and a directer emanation
than the vulgar herd. Hence the senseless idol worship of the
unlearned. Select forms also, as the cleft of a tree, are chosen to
represent materially--_oculis subjecta fidelibus_--the passive power of
generation, an upright rock expressing the active.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account