The Jew, The Gypsy and El IslamBurton, Richard Francis, Sir
Islamic
The Jew, The Gypsy and El Islam
Burton, Richard Francis, Sir
Islam; Jews; Romanies
4. Historical argument and the consensus of mankind.
[212] The idea that man is a compound being, consisting partly of
spirit and partly of matter, mysteriously linked together, and acting
and reacting upon each other, is a neocosmic dream. Savages hold mind
to be a property of matter, like philosophers.
[213] [Chap i. 46.]
[214] Deuteronomy ix. 9. The term was forty days and nights. Amongst
Muslims this has become the recognized period of isolation for those
who are being initiated in mystical and magical practices. It is,
however, directly opposed to the spirit and letter of El Islam.
[215] A modern philosopher was accustomed to say: “And as for that
Christianity which is such, according to the fashion of modern
philosophers and pantheists, without a personal God, without
immortality, without an individuality of man, without historical
faith--it may be a very ingenious and subtle philosophy, but it is no
Christianity at all” (Niebuhr).
[216] Shakespeare, _Hamlet_, Act III., scene ii.
[217] [_The program you use to display the Arabic may reverse the word
order. Reading right to left, the first word is_ الفقر.--_Transcriber_.]
[218] “I think,” said Captain Wyatt, “the Red Indians die better than
white men; perhaps from having less fear about the future.” An acute
conjecture!
[219] Some geographers identify Massa, the town and castle of the
seventh son of Ishmael (Gen. xxv. 14), with Mecca.
[220] Muhammad probably little thought how much more directly this
charge was to be brought against his own revelations. The Ayát, or
inspired versets, were jotted down without order or time in the Musnad
character, which admitted no “vowel points,” upon palm leaves, shoulder
blades of sheep, and similar wild substitutes for paper. In this state
they were cast into a box, and consigned to the keeping of Hafsah, one
of the “Mothers of the Muslims.” After the Prophet’s death they were
drawn from their concealment in a state of disorder, which explains
their present confusion. An edition of the Ayát was first published by
Abubekr, who called it the Koran, or “What shall be read.” This work
was full of errors. The second issue was from the hands of Usman, one
of whose modern titles is “Scribe of the Koran.” His subjects, however,
put him to death, though he had surrounded himself with a rampart
of sacred writings, for his impiety in meddling with inspiration.
Finally, Ali the Khalif, who was more of a scholar than most Arabs,
who wrote poetry, indited proverbs, and according to some improved the
syllabarium by the invention of vowel points, recalled all others,
and issued his own. The Shiah schism to the present day declare that
a whole Juz, or section, of which the Koran now contains thirty, was
omitted and destroyed by the Khalifs hostile to Ali as it was in his
praise. Some passages from the lost revelation are actually quoted in
their theological works. It is true that nothing in the sacred writings
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account