The Jew, The Gypsy and El IslamBurton, Richard Francis, Sir
Islamic
The Jew, The Gypsy and El Islam
Burton, Richard Francis, Sir
Islam; Jews; Romanies
two Israelites, they must go before their own judge.[54] It is sinful
to have recourse to foreign tribunals, and all the decisions of the
latter, when adverse to Jews, must be quashed. Although the heathen
court pass sentence according to Hebrew Law, the plaintiff or denouncer
becomes impious, sacrilegious, and religiously excommunicated, whilst
the Rabbi is bound to make him lose his cause by every possible
contrivance, even by suborning false witnesses against him. And at
last due punishment must be dealt out. The latter is not a Biblical
command, but it results from the commentaries on the Talmuds. When
these works were written Muhammadanism did not exist; Muslims therefore
are now included amongst the Gentiles. They are not, however, like the
Christian idolaters.
In tract Keritoth (or Excision, the seventh of the fifth order,
Kodashim) the learned R. Moshe Meimunah, after describing a fight
between two bulls,[55] the one belonging to a Jew, the other to an
Egyptian, declares (p. 36) that, in case of a dispute between men of
these different races, the Hebrew, if in the right, should go to the
local authority and say, “See, such is the Law!” But he must not do so
if he prefer the Jewish tribunal. The Rabbi adds that no one should be
astonished at such a condition, for all who do not keep the revealed
commandments are not men, but beings whose sole purpose upon earth is
to serve men. Tract Muad Katon (Little Feast, eleventh of the second
order) forbids Jews to salute Gentiles unless in fear of them, and even
then never twice. When it was observed to the author that many Scribes
had so done, he replied that doubtless it was with some such mental
reservation as this, “I salute thee, A., son of B.,” meaning the Rabbi
who had taught the speaker to read the Scriptures (p. 62). El Ruzich,
in his commentaries on the Talmudic tract Abodah Zarah, speaking of
Hebrew accusers of Hebrews and eaters of flesh not ceremonially killed,
declares their death to be a necessity.
At this point it may be advisable to offer a short view of the two
Great Schools of the Holy Land which have influenced Jewish thought in
Christian times. These are, first, that of Tiberias, whence issued the
Talmud of Jerusalem, followed by the Talmud of Babylon; and, second,
the School of Safed, which rendered itself remarkable by the extreme
opinions of its commentaries and glossaries.[56]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account