“There are some who doubt the efficacy of prayer; they argue thus: We
must assume that a certain good thing has been either decreed or not
decreed in favour of a certain person: if it has been decided, prayer
is not wanted; and if it has not been decided, how can prayer effect a
change in the Will of God, who is unchangeable? Neither righteousness
in action, nor prayer, is of any avail in procuring any good thing that
has not been ordained, or in escaping any evil that has been decreed.
This is also the argument of Job in chap. xxi. But the answer to these
arguments is this: Whatever may have been decreed, certain conditions
must be fulfilled before the decree is executed. If a good harvest is
decreed to a certain person, he must plough and sow before he can
secure such a harvest; if punishment is decreed against him, the
punishment is not inflicted in the absence of continued and repeated
sinning. The history of King Ahab shows that the evil decreed against
any sinner takes no effect if the sinner repents and is turned into
another man. The change that takes place in man himself is the direct
effect of prayer and righteousness; it prepares and qualifies him for
receiving benefits and protection from evil. Our Sages say therefore:
Prayer has its good effect both before and after the Divine decree. The
Immutability of God is not less consistent with Efficacy of Prayer than
it is with His knowledge of things which are possible, and may happen
or may not happen. God and His knowledge being unchangeable, everything
must be certain and nothing merely possible. And yet we are convinced
of the existence of these things, and believe at the same time in the
Immutability of God’s knowledge. In the same manner we are convinced of
the Efficacy of Prayer without doubting the Immutability of God’s
Will.”
On Revelation, p. 46.
The term נביא “prophet” only expressed the prophet’s function of
addressing his fellow-men when inspired and impelled by the Spirit of
the Lord. The verb “to prophesy” is therefore in Hebrew expressed by
the nifal or passive. In so far as the Word of God has been revealed to
him he is called ראה, חוזה and צפה “Seer,” איש אלהים “Man of
God,” איש הרוח “The inspired.” In the time of Samuel the title ראה
was generally given to the prophet instead of נביא (1 Sam. ix. 9), as
his advice was also sought by many who believed him to be able to
foresee coming events and to know everything. As, however, the word
נביא only describes the prophet as addressing his fellow-men, it is
used both of the true and the false prophets, and also of teachers and
preachers generally. The Targum on the Prophets (Jer. xxix. 15; Isa.
xxix. 10) renders, therefore, the term נביא in some instances:
מלפין “teachers,” ספריא “scholars.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account