The word ξένος, which is the root of the words for
“hospitality” and its opposite, has no equivalent in English. A
ξένος was a man of another nation, who approached without
hostile intent. The test of civilization was the manner in which such a
ξένος was dealt with. The Greek traditions, even their
extant literature, have a very lively recollection of the time when
hospitality was by no means universal, when the ξένος was
treated as an enemy taken in arms or worse. The one damning epithet of
the Cyclops is ἄξενος, “inhospitable.”[197] The high
commendation bestowed upon the princely hospitality of the Homeric
barons itself indicates that this virtue was not yet a matter of course,
and that boorish nations and individuals did not possess it.
Legally, of course, the ξένος had no rights. Such claim as
he could make for protection rested upon the favor of the gods,
especially of Zeus, who was frequently addressed by the cult title of
Ξένιος, the Protector of Strangers. The uncertain aid of
the gods was soon displaced by personal relations between individuals
and groups of individuals in different states, who were mutually
πρόξενοι to each other, a title that always created a very
definite moral obligation and soon a legal one as well. So, when
Alexander destroyed Thebes, he spared the πρόξενοι of his
own family and of the Macedonians in general.[198]
The institution and the development had practically gone on in similar
ways all through the Mediterranean world. The Bedouins still maintain
the ancient customs of their fathers in that respect. The Romans had the
word _hospes_, of which the history is a close parallel to that of
ξένος.
Of the Jews the same thing may be said. The Bible enjoins the protection
of strangers as a primary obligation. They were the living symbols of
the Egyptian bondage. So Exodus xxiii. 9, “Also thou shalt not oppress a
stranger, for ye know the heart of a stranger, seeing ye were strangers
in the land of Egypt.” One of Job’s protests of righteousness is his
hospitality (Job xxxi. 32).
In these circumstances just what could the charge of
μισοξενία, of “inhospitality,” have meant? We shall look in
vain in Greek literature for an injunction to hospitality as finely
phrased as the passage just quoted from Exodus. To understand the term
as applied to the Jews we shall have to examine the words that are used
for the acts connected with hospitality.
In Homer the word ξεινίζω[199] is frequently found.
Strictly of course it means simply “to deal with a stranger,” but it is
used principally in the sense of “entertain at dinner.” The wandering
stranger might as such claim the hospitality of the people among whom
chance had brought him, and claim it in the very concrete sense that
food and lodging at the master’s table were his of right. Indeed it
would almost seem that he became _pro hac vice_ a member of the family
group in which he partook of a meal, protected in life and limb by the
blood-vengeance of his temporary kinsmen.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account