Whether honestly or not, the Roman government aimed its measures solely
at certain indubitably criminal acts, which, it was alleged, were
associated with the practice of the foreign cults. These acts were often
offenses against public morality. Conditions of high religious
excitement often sought a physical outlet in dancing or shouting, and no
doubt often enough, when the stimulation of wine or drugs or
flagellation was added, in sexual excesses. Instances that were perhaps
isolated and exceptional were treated as characteristic, and made the
basis for repressive legislation.[261]
Another and better founded objection to many of the forms of foreign
religion was the opportunities they offered for swindlers. As early as
139 B.C.E. the astrologers were banished from Rome, not because of the
feeling that the astrological system was baseless, but because of the
readiness with which professed astrologers defrauded the simple by
portentous horoscopes, which they alone could interpret or avert.[262]
The “Chaldeans” or _mathematici_ included many men who were neither the
one nor the other. It was obviously easier for a Syrian or Oriental
generally to make these claims than for either Greek or Italian. Syrians
in the city accordingly found the profession of quack tempting and
profitable, and doubtless many Jews as well entered it.
We have evidence too that many of the mushroom political associations
were grouped about some of these foreign deities. The possession of
common _sacra_ was, in a sense, the distinguishing mark of any organized
body of men, and organization of the masses in all forms was the
commonest device of the agitators of the revolutionary period. Clodius
had his mobs grouped in _decuries_ and _curiae_.[263] It is likely
enough that in some of these groups, consisting largely of freedmen of
foreign birth, various foreign deities were worshiped in the communal
_sacra_, so that the various police measures restricting or forbidding
these rites may have had strong political motives as well.
When Caesar reconstituted the state after Pharsalia, he knew from direct
experience the danger that lay in unrestricted association ostensibly
for religious purposes. The θίασοι, “cult-associations,”
which he dissolved were undoubtedly grouped about some Greek or Oriental
deity. The Jews were specially exempted, for reasons easy to guess at,
but which we cannot exactly determine.[264] This striking favor cannot
but have immensely increased their influence. We need not suppose that
Caesar’s orders were any more effective than previous decrees of this
character had been. But even a temporary clearing of the field gave the
active propagandists among the Jews an opportunity which they fully
utilized.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account