Josephus regards the great rebellion of 68 C.E. as the direct
consequence of this insurrection of Judah. He is therefore very bitter
against this “fourth philosophic system,” which spread among the younger
men and brought the country to ruin. It is at least curious that in his
earlier work, the Wars, in which the recollection of Jewish disaster
would be, one would suppose, vastly more vivid, he does not ascribe to
this rebellion any such far-reaching effects (Wars, II. viii. 1); nor is
it in any degree likely that this insurrection was after all more than
what it appears to be there, a sporadic outburst in that hotbed of
unrest, the Galilean hills, noteworthy only for the special zeal with
which the theocratic principles were announced.
No riots or disturbances are mentioned in Judea till the famous
image-riots of the time of Pontius Pilate. However we may wish to
discount the highly colored narrative preserved in Josephus, there can
be no doubt that these riots did take place. It may even be that the
representation of influential Jews induced the much desired concession
on Pilate’s part of removing the “images.” But what these images were
does not appear with any clearness from Josephus’ account, and of course
we are under no obligation to take literally the “five days and five
nights” during which the ambassadors lay prostrate, with bare necks, at
Pilate’s feet.
Josephus speaks of the “images of Caesar which are called standards”
(Wars, II. ix. 2; Ant. XVIII. iii. 1). The Roman standards, _signa_,
σημαίαι, often contained representations of the emperor.
But these were in the form of medallions in flat relief, hung upon the
standard. They would have been noticed only upon relatively close
inspection. There were also statues in the camp. But it is quite
unlikely that if the Roman provincial administrators were instructed to
issue no coins with the imperial effigy, they would be allowed to carry
into the city actual statues of the emperor. They may well have
forgotten that the military standards would be themselves offensive, if
they bore, as they always did, the representation of animal forms. All
legions at this time carried the eagle, and most of them had other
heraldic animals as well.[305]
Now it may be remembered that the chief legion permanently encamped in
Syria, of which detachments must have accompanied Pilate upon his
transference of the praetorium from Caesarea to Jerusalem, was the Tenth
Legion, called Fretensis (Leg. X Fretensis), and that its standards were
a bull and a pig.[306] To the mass of the Jews the carrying, as though
in triumph, of the gilded image of an unclean animal must have seemed
nothing less than derision, and can easily explain the fury of the
populace.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account