We may say, in conclusion, that the economic and political position of
the Jews in the empire was unique in one sense. There were no other
groups that had exactly the same rights, or were subject to exactly the
same demands as the Jews. But in another sense that position was not at
all unique. Many other groups of men had rights somewhat like those of
the Jewish synagogues, and played a part in the social economy similar
to theirs; and, as individuals, there was probably nothing to mark out
the Jew from his fellows in the community.
We cannot tell how far and how long the Jews would have been able to
maintain their position. There seems however to have been nothing in the
conditions of the Diocletianic empire that threatened the stability of
the synagogues in the form in which they were then found. The religious
basis of the state—the maintenance of a common cult for the whole
empire—had practically been abandoned. At one time, under Aurelian,[404]
the emperor’s devotion to the solar cult had almost made of that the
state religion. But in general it may be said that the absolutism of
Diocletian rendered such bonds unnecessary. Where all men were born
subjects or slaves (“slaves of their duties,” _servi functionum_, the
guild-men are called explicitly[405]) of the same master, it could be
considered indifferent whether they all maintained the same theology.
But whether the Jews might have maintained their position or not, if the
conditions had remained the same, is a purely hypothetical question.
When Christianity became the state religion, under Theodosius,[406] a
step was taken that Jews must perforce regard as retrogressive. In
ancient times participation in the common _sacra_ was of the essence of
membership in a state.[407] That principle was, however, tolerantly
enforced. In the first place the mere existence of private _sacra_ was
not deemed to imperil the public _sacra_. Secondly, exceptions and
exemptions that did not take offensive forms were freely allowed. But
when Theodosius established Christianity, he consciously strove to make
the ecclesia coterminous with the empire. “As well could those be saved
who were not in the ark with Noah,” Cyprian[408] had cried, “as they be
saved who are not in the church.” What was originally a group of elect,
a company of saints (ἅγιοι), “the salt of the earth,”[409]
had been expanded into a world-filling community.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account