His was a strange blend. Various epochs met in him, and it is not
surprising that many incongruities resulted from that fact. First of all
he was in every sense a Macedonian despot. Macedonians had always been
accustomed to the concentration of supreme power in the hands of a
single individual. For four or five generations Antiochus’ immediate
ancestors had wielded such power over a rabble of nations stretching
from the Aegean to the frontiers of India.[128] The emotional reactions
which the existence and the possession of this power must have, were
present in him. One constant result of it, the absence of any real
social life, is an especially fertile source of deterioration, but the
worst effects are noticed chiefly in those born to the purple.
Antiochus’ exile saved him from them. Yet nothing could save him from
the consciousness that he might, if he chose, gratify every whim, and
yield to every impulse, and his associates found quickly enough that his
_bonhomie_ and engaging simplicity were moods, which might be succeeded
by bursts of quite incalculable and murderous rage.
There was the additional fact that the monarchy founded by Alexander
was in legal contemplation the reign of a god made flesh. Seleucus,
we may remember, entered almost at once into the titularies of Sumer
and Akkad.[129] The second Antiochus was styled “the God,”
Θεός, _tout simple_. Our Antiochus called himself
Epiphanes—which, it need scarcely be said, is to be translated “the
Manifest Deity,” and not “the Illustrious.”[130] And, at any rate at
certain moments, the designation was doubtless a real one to him and
not a conscious pose. Worship of the king, the foundation of the
later Augustus-cult, was an apparent unifying element in the
hopeless jumble of gods and rituals. For that purpose it might be
encouraged even by hard-headed peasants like Vespasian, or
philosophers like Marcus, who had no illusions about the character
of their divinity. But that Alexander in all sincerity believed
himself to be god can scarcely be questioned, and Epiphanes may
often have similarly impressed himself.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account