The sects of Pharisees and Sadducees, whose disputes fill later Jewish
history, joined issue on a number of points. No doubt there was an
economic and social cleavage between them as well. But perhaps the most
nearly fundamental difference of doctrine related to the _Olam ha-bo_.
The Pharisees asserted, and the Sadducees denied, the doctrine of
resurrection. It is stated by Josephus,[151] that the Sadducees called
in question the _Olam ha-bo_ itself. When and where these sects took
form is uncertain. The Pharisees at least are fully developed, and form
a powerful political party under John Hyrcanus.[152] It is very unlikely
that they are related to the Hasidim or are a continuation of them. The
latter were a national, anti-Hellenic organization, and contained men of
all shades of beliefs and interests. But the Pharisees, like the
Hasidim, began as a brotherhood or a group of brotherhoods, however
political their aims and actions were in later times. The fact is
indicated by the name _Haber_, “comrade,” which they gave themselves,
and the contemptuous _Am ha-aretz_, “clod,” οἱ πολλοί, with
which they designated those who were not members of their congregations.
Now the _Haberim_, who preached the World-to-Come, were not in a
primitive stage of culture, but in a very advanced one. Their God was
not master of a city, but Lord of the whole earth. And they had long
maintained the principle that merit in the eyes of God was determined by
conduct, both formal and moral, a distinction less profoundly separating
than seems at first to be the case. If that were so, anyone, Jew or
Gentile, might conceivably acquire that merit. How was the _Olam ha-bo_
to be refused to anyone who had taken upon himself the yoke of the Law,
who did all that the Lord required at his hands? Jewish tradition knew
of several eminently righteous gentiles, such as Job, in whom God was
well pleased. It was an untenable proposition to men whose cardinal
religious doctrine had for centuries been ethical and universal that all
but a few men were permanently excluded from the beatitude of life after
death.[153]
Since, however, the promises of the sacred literature were addressed
primarily to Israel, those who were not of Abraham’s seed could become
“comrades” only by first becoming Jews. That conception involved no
difficulty whatever. The people of the ancient world had empirically
learned some of the more elementary facts of biological heredity; but
membership in a community, though determined by heredity in the first
instance, was not essentially so determined. In earlier times, when the
communities were first instituted, not even the pretense of kinship was
maintained. The essential fact was the assumption of common _sacra_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account