8. "Dyslalia Viewed as a Centre-Asthenia." Dr. Walter B. Swift, of Boston,
Mass.
9. "Constructive Delusions, " Dr. John T. MacCurdy and Dr. W. T. Treadway,
of New York, N. Y.
10. "Narcissism," Dr. J. S. Van Teslaar, of Boston, Mass.
11. "The Origin of Supernatural Explanations," Dr. Tom A. Williams, of
Washington, D. C.
12. "The Psychoanalytic Treatment of Hystero-Epilepsy, " L. E. Emerson, Ph.
D., of Boston, Mass.
The meeting was called to order by the President, Dr. Alfred Reginald Allen,
at 9:30 A. M., in Parlor E, Hotel McAlpin.
Dr. Allen delivered The Presidential Address.
Dr. James J. Putnam, of Boston, read a paper entitled, "The Necessity of
Metaphysics."[1]
[1] Published in the June-July number, p. 88, of this Journal.
DISCUSSION
DR. MORTON PRINCE, Boston: I sympathize with Dr. Putnam in his interest in
philosophical problems, my only conflict with his point of view being with
what I conceive to be a mixing of problems. I suppose that if we want an
explanation of the universe it must be in terms of philosophy or
metaphysics. The only alternative is to accept it as a phenomenal universe,
as it is. You will remember that when it was reported to Carlisle that
Margaret Fuller said she "accepted the universe," he replied "Gad! I think
she had better!". So we have got either to explain the universe in terms of
philosophy or accept it as it is.
I have no objection to introducing philosophical problems if we do not
confuse those problems with our psychological problems. They are entirely
distinct. This distinction between philosophy and science the physicists
and chemists clearly recognize. One of their problems is the ultimate nature
of matter, but it is not a problem of practical physics and chemistry. These
deal, let us say, with phenomenal atoms and molecules, with their
attractions and repulsions, etc. In dealing with the problem of the
ultimate nature of matter the chemist analyzes matter and finds that it can
be reduced to atoms, and then analyzes the atoms and finds them composed of
electrons flying about within the circumscribed space of an atom. Then he
analyzes the electron and reduces it to negative electricity, and when asked
what negative electricity is he says it is a form of the energy of the
universe, and stops there and says--"I don't know," when asked to explain
energy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account