The journal of Elizabeth Lady Holland (1791-1811) Volume 2 (of 2)Holland, Elizabeth Vassall Fox, Lady
History
The journal of Elizabeth Lady Holland (1791-1811) Volume 2 (of 2)
Holland, Elizabeth Vassall Fox, Lady
Holland, Elizabeth Vassall Fox, Lady, 1770-1845 -- Diaries
_14th._--Messengers in. Immediately on L.’s arrival he presented to the
F. Governt. a short recapitulation of what had already passed during
the negotiation, recalling to their recollection that the principle on
which the E. Governt. had consented to treat was the _uti possidetis_,
and reminding them how much this had been forgotten and departed from
in their late demands, and concluding with the alternative, either to
resume the uti possidetis as the principle of the Treaty, or to send
him passports to return to England.[229] Three days elapsed before
any answer was given to this note. General Clarke proposed that the
business should be carried on by conversations, and not by written
notes, which was refused. He also cavilled at some expressions in
L.’s note, but at length presented a note couched in rather a high
tone, complaining that when the Treaty was far advanced, and that Ld.
Yarmouth was on the point of signing, L. should have been sent over
to make inadmissible pretensions and to disappoint the hopes which
all Europe had conceived of peace. The _uti possidetis_ could not be
the basis of the Treaty, unless the Emperor were to be replaced in
the possession of Fiume, Treviso, and of all the conquests which he
had renounced by the Peace of Presburg. Upon this L. sent for his
passports. Three days were employed in sending from one office to
another to obtain them, without success. _M. de Lima_ (the Portuguese)
called upon him, and implored in the most earnest manner that he would
not break off the negotiation, as this would leave Portugal and Spain
exposed to certain and immediate destruction. No effect being produced
by this manœuvre, and L. persisting in his demand of passports, a 2nd
note was sent, expressed in much more civil and moderate language, and
tho’ _denying_ that the _uti possidetis_ had ever been admitted as the
basis of the Treaty, and declaring that without great modifications it
was inadmissible, but concluding with these words, ‘Mais l’Empereur
l’adopte puisqu’il le trouve.’ It is remarkable that in this note
the word _adopte_ was substituted in the Emperor’s own handwriting,
in place of _accepte_ or _admet_. And in the date, the 11th had been
inserted instead of the 7th, which had been the original date, so
that the note had been detained some days, in hopes of Lauderdale’s
yielding. On receiving this, L. addressed a note to the French
Governt., in which, without taking any notice of the contents of
theirs, he declared he could not go on with the negotiation, unless
he had an explicit assurance from them that he should have passports
at any time within half an hour, for himself or couriers, whenever he
should chance to demand them. This note produced a very civil answer
from Talleyrand, ascribing to accident entirely the blame of the
former delay, and assuring him that it was in no respect owing to any
want of civility to him. Lauderdale returned a second note, in answer
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account