The journal of George Fox, vol. 2 of 2 : $b Being an historical account of his life, travels, sufferings, and Christian experiences.Fox, George
Religion
The journal of George Fox, vol. 2 of 2 : $b Being an historical account of his life, travels, sufferings, and Christian experiences.
Fox, George
Fox, George, 1624-1691
“But,” said I, “seeing thou art a great and leading man among the
Papists, and hast been taught and bred up under the Pope, and seeing
thou sayest, ‘there is no salvation but in your church,’ I desire to
know of thee, what it is that doth bring salvation in your church?”
He answered, “a good life.” “And nothing else?” said I. “Yes,” he
said, “good works.” “And is this it that brings salvation in your
church, a good life and good works? Is this your doctrine and
principle?” said I. “Yes,” said he. “Then,” said I, “neither thou,
nor the Pope, nor any of the Papists know what it is that brings
salvation.” Then he asked me, what brought salvation in our church?
I told him, “that which brought salvation to the church in the
apostles’ days, the same brought salvation to us, and not another;
namely, ‘the Grace of God,’ which, the Scripture says, brings
salvation, and hath appeared to all men, which taught the saints
then, and teaches us now. This Grace which brings salvation, teaches
to deny ungodliness and worldly lusts, and to live soberly,
righteously, and godly. So it is not the good works nor the good
life that brings salvation, but the Grace.” “What!” said the Papist,
“doth this Grace that brings salvation, appear unto all men?” “Yes,”
said I. “Then,” said he, “I deny that.” I replied, “all that deny
that, are sect-makers, and are not in the universal faith, grace,
and truth, which the apostles were in.”
Then he spoke to me about the mother church. I told him, “the
several sects in Christendom had accused us, and said, ‘we forsook
our mother-church.’ The Papists charged us with forsaking their
church, saying, ‘Rome was the only mother-church.’ The Episcopalians
taxed us with forsaking the old Protestant religion, alleging,
‘theirs was the reformed mother-church.’ The Presbyterians and
Independents blamed us for leaving them, each of them pretending,
‘theirs was the right reformed church.’” But, I said “if we could
own any outward city or place to be the mother-church, we should own
Jerusalem, where the gospel was first preached by Christ himself and
his apostles, where Christ suffered, where the great conversion to
Christianity by Peter was, where were the types, figures, and
shadows, which Christ ended, and where Christ commanded his
disciples to ‘wait until they were endued with power from on high.’
If any outward place deserved to be called the mother, that was the
place where the first great conversion to Christianity was. But the
apostle saith, Gal. iv. 25-27, ‘Jerusalem, which now is, is in
bondage with her children; but Jerusalem which is above, is free,
which is the mother of us all.’ For it is written, ‘Rejoice, thou
barren, that bearest not; break forth and cry, thou that travailest
not; for the desolate hath many more children than she which hath an
husband.’ The apostle does not say, outward Jerusalem was the
mother, though the first and great conversion to Christianity was
there.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account