The journal of Montaigne's travels in Italy by way of Switzerland and Germany in 1580 and 1581, Volume 2 (of 3)Montaigne, Michel de
History
The journal of Montaigne's travels in Italy by way of Switzerland and Germany in 1580 and 1581, Volume 2 (of 3)
Montaigne, Michel de
Germany -- Description and travel; Italy -- Description and travel; Switzerland -- Description and travel
[12] Henry III. He fled secretly from Cracow on hearing of the death
of Charles IX. in 1574, but once clear of Poland he was in no hurry to
get back to France. He spent two months in traversing Lombardy, and was
regaled sumptuously by all the petty princes and nobles. The Emperor
Maximilian and the Doge of Venice gave him much excellent advice, but
he was only impressed by the processions and dances and fine dresses,
which he proposed to reproduce in France.
[13] Fusina.
[14] Arnaud du Ferrier was a distinguished French jurisconsult. Henry
II. made him President of the Chambre des Enquêtes. He represented
France at the Council of Trent, and by a violent anti-Roman speech he
raised a great uproar and was sent as ambassador to Venice in quasi
disgrace, and there Montaigne met him. According to Brantôme he used
to repair to Padua and there lecture on law. The king was greatly
displeased at this and recalled him. Henry of Navarre invited him to
his court and he became a Protestant. He died in 1585.
On the margin of the MS. Montaigne has written: “Ce viellard, qui a
passé septante cinq ans, à ce qu’il dit, jouit d’un eage sein & enjoué.
Ses façons & ses discours ont, je ne sçay quoi de scholastique, peu
de vivacité et de pouinte. Ses opinions panchent fort evidamment, en
matiere de nos affaires, vers les innovations Calviniennes.”
[15] A decree of the Council of Ten, July 12, 1380, ordains: “Si
quis nobilis vel civis acciperet literas ab aliquo de extra de re
spectante ad statum nostrum, illas capitibus Consilii tenerentur subito
presentare, et Capita debeant inquirere diligenter principium talis
praticæ, ut nostri cives omnino starent separati ab omni pratica et
commercio dominorum et comunitatum, et ab omni pratica rei spectantis
ad statum.”
[16] Fynes Moryson writes (Part iv., ed. 1903, p. 128): “I find the
generall Revenue of this State valued at two millions of gold yearly,
though Monsr. Villamont attributes so much to the citty of Venice alone
... and for particular cittyes these relations record, that Padoa
brings yearly into the Treasure of Venice thirteene thousand Ducates;
Vicenza thirtye two thousand; Verona nyntye thousand; Brescia (besydes
many extraordinary Subsidyes) one hundred thousand four hundred and
fyfty; Bergamo fyfty thousand; Vdane twenty fyve thousand; Trevigi
fourskore thousand.” But farther on he says: “A late writer hath
published in print that the generall Revenue of Venice amounts yearely
to two millions of gold crowns: that the Townes yield yearely eight
hundred thousand Crownes.”--A great disparity. Montaigne probably
refers to the share of Venice alone.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account