The Journal of Negro History, Volume 6, 1921Various
History
The Journal of Negro History, Volume 6, 1921
Various
African Americans -- Periodicals
That this prophetic message from the _Intelligencer_ reflected the
opinion of the people of Western Virginia and the state of mind of the
Congress, was clearly shown by subsequent events. On the nineteenth
day of the Convention an adroit attempt was made to have West Virginia
become a slave State.[68] Thomas Harrison, of Harrison county, offered
a resolution providing that the making of a new constitution be
dispensed with for the present, and that the Virginia Constitution be
referred to a Committee of Five with instructions to modify it to suit
the needs of the proposed new State. Significant among the provisions
of the Virginia Constitution was one altered at the Richmond Secession
Convention to the effect that the General Assembly should have power
to prohibit the future emancipation of slaves. By its provisions,
therefore, the slave could never become free during his residence in
the State. On motion of Mr. Van Winkle, the Convention voted that
action on the resolution be indefinitely postponed.[69]
Battelle, persistent in his efforts to make some provision in
reference to the freedom of the slaves, decided to submit emancipation
to the people. Accordingly, therefore, on the twelfth of February,
1862, he offered the following:[70]
(1) "Resolved. That at the same time when this Constitution is
submitted to the qualified voters of the proposed new state to be
voted for or against, an additional section to article----, in
the words following: 'No slave shall be brought or free person of
color come into this state for permanent residence after this
constitution goes into operation, and all children, born of slave
mothers after the year 1870 shall be free, the males at the age
of twenty-eight years, and the females at the age of eighteen
years; and the children of such females shall be free at birth'.
Shall be separately submitted to the qualified voters of the
proposed new state for their adoption or rejection, and if the
majority of the votes cast for and against said additional
section are in favor of its adoption, it shall be made a part of
article--of this constitution and not otherwise."
(2) "Resolved that the committee on schedule be and they are
hereby instructed to report the necessary provisions for carrying
the foregoing resolution into effect."
Mr. Sinsel moved that the resolutions be made the order of the next
morning at ten o'clock; Mr. Hall, of Marion county, moved to amend the
motion to the effect that it be laid on the table. Mr. Battelle
deplored the application of the gag rule. The question not being a
debatable one, the vote was taken. By a majority of one vote of the
forty-seven cast, the resolutions were indefinitely laid on the
table.[71]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account