The Journal of Prison Discipline and Philanthropy (New Series, No. 3, January 1864)Philadelphia Society for Alleviating the Miseries of Public Prisons
History
The Journal of Prison Discipline and Philanthropy (New Series, No. 3, January 1864)
Philadelphia Society for Alleviating the Miseries of Public Prisons
Charities -- Periodicals; Prisons -- Periodicals
Taking, then, the existence of the evils, as we have only hinted at
them, and admitting (as we are free to do, and as we do with pleasure,
because it is just) that while the cry against the magistracy is
universal, the fault is really found in only a part of them, the inquiry
is, “how shall all this be remedied?”
“_Elect better Aldermen_,” say those who wish for a better state of
things. “Elect suitable men, and the evil is at once remedied.”
Undoubtedly the plan is good; but is it practicable? For many years the
Aldermen of Philadelphia have been elected by the people, and in many
instances the choice has been judicious, but in others either the
official conduct of the magistrate has deteriorated into the grossest
kind of improprieties, or he has been compelled to give place to some
greater favorite of the voters of his ward, who would begin his
descending march some grades below that at which his predecessor closed
his career. So large a portion of the duties of the Alderman who has
most to do as a police magistrate, are beyond the knowledge and sympathy
of the respectable portion of the community, that little interest is
taken in his election by those who feel a sense of shame at the
improprieties of a functionary connected with the administration of
justice; and in many parts of the city the knowledge and sympathy of
that class would avail nothing towards the election of another person.
The Grand Jury recently inquiring for the city and county of
Philadelphia, made the following severe strictures upon Aldermen:
“It has been a matter of exceeding regret that the law has not
clothed this body with discretionary power to tax the magistrates,
before whom the cases were heard, with the costs, as a proper rebuke
to that avarice which seeks to convert litigation and contention
into a source of gain,—which offers a premium for crimes, by making
the ministers of the law the transgressors, and prostituting the
province of peace-makers to that of a common barrator.”
As the Grand jury did not, of course, desire to be directly personal
when they were not about to find a bill, they let their censure take a
general course. They set forth an evil, and that, perhaps, was enough,
till some special case of wrong should be laid before them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account