The journal of prison discipline and philanthropy (New series, No. 57), March, 1918Pennsylvania Prison Society
History
The journal of prison discipline and philanthropy (New series, No. 57), March, 1918
Pennsylvania Prison Society
Charities -- Periodicals; Prisons -- Periodicals
There is no longer any debate about the Indeterminate Sentence. The
principle is written upon the statutes of nearly every State of the
Union, tho in a debilitated and illogical form in the Commonwealth
of Pennsylvania. Amos W. Butler, Secretary Board of Charities in
Indiana, in an address delivered in one of the churches declared that
we had brought very little understanding to bear upon our treatment of
criminals until recent years. He compared our knowledge of smallpox,
yellow fever and other diseases with crime and concluded that we made
as many blunders in considering the offender as we formerly made in our
attitude toward these mysterious and dreaded diseases.
“Prisons are the visible signs of our failures. It is now within the
power of man to abolish many diseases from the earth, and so with
crime. Criminals are not sent to prison for punishment, as many seem
to believe, but prisons exist for the confinement of prisoners for the
safety of society and for the reform of the man or woman there. They
should, if possible, be reformed and returned to society.”
The speaker favored the indeterminate sentence. He said you would not
send a diphtheria patient to the hospital for a definite time, say
two or three weeks. Complications might appear and more time may be
required to effect a cure. The same is true of criminals. They should
be sent there until reformed, until fit to be returned.
Indiana has an indeterminate sentence law and in the past twenty years
11,000 men and women have been released under that law. Seventy-five
per cent. of them succeeded, or made good. Prisoners there have earned
about $3,000,000 for themselves.
The absolutely indeterminate sentence is not yet in vogue in any
State. A criminal under such a sentence would be sent to prison as
to a hospital to remain till cured of his malady. Perhaps, in some
cases he would be subject to some detention as a deterrent to others
contemplating entering upon a criminal career. Specialists would
determine when he was ready to enter the community. We may at some
time adopt such a system when there are enough men and women having
the skill and training necessary to pass on the mental and moral
characteristics of such patients.
Perhaps the best form of sentence is by statutes which fix the time
for any given offense. The time for arson, for instance, may be placed
from two to twenty years. It is the function of the judge or jury to
determine whether the accused is guilty. If found guilty, the defendant
is placed in care of a judicious board of control who will release the
criminal at such time as they may deem best for him and the community.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account