The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, Vol. I, Nos. 1-4, 1867Various
Philosophy
The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, Vol. I, Nos. 1-4, 1867
Various
Philosophy -- Periodicals
The distinction between the _old_ and the _new_ divinities marks still
more this progress of moral liberty. Among the former, who personify the
powers of nature, a gradation is already established. In the first
place, the untamed and lower powers, Chaos, Tartarus, Erebus; then
Uranus, Gea, the Giants and the Titans; in a higher rank, Prometheus, at
first the friend of the new gods, the benefactor of men, then punished
by Jupiter for that apparent beneficence; an inconsequence which is
explained through this, that if Prometheus taught industry to men, he
created an occasion of discords and dissensions, by not giving them
instruction more elevated,—morality, the science of government, the
guarantees of property. Such is the profound sense of that myth, and
Plato thus explains it in his dialogues.
Another class of divinities equally ancient, but already ethical,
although they recall the fatality of the physical laws, are the
Eumenides, Dice, and the Furies. We see appearing here the ideas of
right and justice, but of exclusive, absolute, strict, unconscious
right, under the form of an implacable vengeance, or, like the ancient
Nemesis, of a power which abases all that is high, and re-establishes
equality by levelling; a thing which is the opposite of true justice.
Finally, this development of the classic ideal reveals itself more
clearly in the _theogony_ and _genealogy_ of the gods, in their origin
and their succession, by the abasement of the divinities of the previous
races; in the hostility which flashes out between them, in the
resolution which has carried away the sovereignty from the old to place
it in the hands of the new divinities. Meanwhile the distinction
develops itself to the point of engendering strife, and the conflict
becomes the principal event of mythology.
This conflict is that of nature and spirit, and it is the law of the
world. Under the historic form, it is the perfecting of human nature,
the successive conquest of rights and property, the amelioration of laws
and of the political constitution. In the religious representations, it
is the triumph of the moral divinities over the powers of nature.
This combat is announced as the grandest catastrophe in the history of
the world: moreover, this is not the subject of a particular myth; it is
the principal, decisive fact, which constitutes the centre of this
mythology.
The conclusion of all this in respect to the history of art and to the
development of the ideal, is that art ought to act like mythology, and
reject as unworthy all that is purely physical or animal, that which is
confused, fantastic, or obscure, all gross mingling of the material and
the spiritual. All these creations of an ill-regulated imagination find
here no more place; they must flee before the light of the Soul. Art
purifies itself of all caprice, fancy, or symbolic accessory, of every
vague and confused idea.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account