The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, Vol. I, Nos. 1-4, 1867Various
Philosophy
The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, Vol. I, Nos. 1-4, 1867
Various
Philosophy -- Periodicals
8. Nevertheless Monads must have qualities—otherwise they would not even
be entities; and if simple substances did not differ in their qualities,
there would be no means by which we could become aware of the changes of
things, since all that is in compound bodies is derived from simple
ingredients, and Monads, being without qualities, would be
indistinguishable one from another, seeing also they do not differ in
quantity. Consequently, a _plenum_ being supposed, each place could in
any movement receive only the just equivalent of what it had had before,
and one state of things would be indistinguishable from another.
9. Moreover, each Monad must differ from every other, for there are
never two beings in nature perfectly alike, and in which it is
impossible to find an internal difference, or one founded on some
intrinsic denomination.
10. I take it for granted, furthermore, that every created being is
subject to change—consequently the created Monad; and likewise that this
change is continual in each.
11. It follows, from what we have now said, that the natural changes of
Monads proceed from an internal principle, since no external cause can
influence the interior.
12. But, besides the principle of change, there must also be a detail of
changes, embracing, so to speak, the specification and the variety of
the simple substances.
13. This detail must involve multitude in unity or in simplicity: for as
all natural changes proceed by degrees, something changes and something
remains, and consequently there must be in the simple substance a
plurality of affections and relations, although there are no parts.
14. This shifting state, which involves and represents multitude in
unity, or in the simple substance, is nothing else than what we call
Perception, which must be carefully distinguished from _apperception_,
or consciousness, as will appear in the sequel. Here it is that the
Cartesians have especially failed, making no account of those
perceptions of which we are not conscious. It is this that has led them
to suppose that spirits are the only Monads, and that there are no souls
of brutes or other Entelechies. It is owing to this that they have
vulgarly confounded protracted torpor with actual death, and have fallen
in with the scholastic prejudice, which believes in souls entirely
separate. Hence, also, ill affected minds have been confirmed in the
opinion that the soul is mortal.
15. The action of the internal principle which causes the change, or the
passage from one perception to another, may be called Appetition. It is
true, the desire cannot always completely attain to every perception to
which it tends, but it always attains to something thereof, and arrives
at new perceptions.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account