The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, Vol. I, Nos. 1-4, 1867Various
Philosophy
The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, Vol. I, Nos. 1-4, 1867
Various
Philosophy -- Periodicals
Better is he who is above temptation than he who, being tempted,
overcomes; since the latter but suppresses the evil inclination in his
breast, which the former has not. Whoever is tempted has so far sinned
as to entertain the tempting lust stirring within him, and betraying his
lapse from singleness or holiness. The virtuous choose, and are virtuous
by choice; while the holy, being one, are above all need of
deliberating, their volitions answering spontaneously to their desires.
It is the cleft personality, or _other_ within, that confronts and
seduces the Will; the Adversary and Deuce we become individually, and
thus impersonate in the Snake.[12]
III.—SERPENT SYMBOL.
One were an Œdipus to expound this serpent mythology; yet failing this,
were to miss finding the keys to the mysteries of Genesis, and Nature
were the chaos and abyss; since hereby the one rejoins man’s parted
personality, and recreates lost mankind. Coeval with flesh, the symbol
appears wherever traces of civilization exist, a remnant of it in the
ancient Phallus worship having come to us disguised in our May-day
dance. Nor was it confined to carnal knowledge merely. The serpent
symbolized divine wisdom, also; and it was under this acceptation that
it became associated with those “traditionary teachers of mankind whose
genial wisdom entitled them to divine honors.” An early Christian sect,
called Ophites, worshipped it as the personation of natural knowledge.
So the injunction, “Be ye wise as serpents and harmless as doves,”
becomes the more significant when we learn that _seraph_ in the original
means a serpent; _cherub_, a dove; these again symbolizing facts in
osteological science as connected with the latest theories of the
invertebrated cranium accepted by eminent naturalists, and so
substantiating the symbol in nature; this being ophiomorphous, a series
of spires, crowned, winged, webbed, finned, footed in structure, set
erect, prone, trailing, as charged with life in higher potency or lower;
man, supreme in personal uprightness, and holding the sceptre of
dominion as he maintains his inborn rectitude, or losing his prerogative
as he lapses from his integrity, thus debasing his form and parcelling
his gifts away in the prone shapes distributed throughout Nature’s
kingdoms; or, again, aspiring for lost supremacy, he uplifts and crowns
his fallen form with forehead, countenance, speech, thereby liberating
the genius from the slime of its prone periods, and restoring it to
rectitude, religion, science, fellowship, the ideal arts.[13]
“Unless above himself he can
Erect himself, how poor a thing is man.”
IV.—EMBRYONS.
“The form is in the archetype before it appears in the work, in the
divine mind before it exists in the creature.”—_Leibnitz._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account