The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, Vol. I, Nos. 1-4, 1867Various
Philosophy
The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, Vol. I, Nos. 1-4, 1867
Various
Philosophy -- Periodicals
It is currently reported that Raphael painted the “Transfiguration” at
the instance of Cardinal Giulio de Medici, and that in honor of the
latter he introduced the two saints—Julian and Lawrence—on the mount;
St. Julian suggesting the ill-fated Giuliano de Medici, the Cardinal’s
father, and St. Lawrence representing his uncle, “Lorenzo the
Magnificent,” the greatest of the Medici line, and greatest man of his
time in Italy. “The haughty Michael Angelo refused to enter the lists in
person against Raphael, but put forward as a fitting rival Sebastian del
Piombo, a Venetian.” Raphael painted, as his masterpiece, the
“Transfiguration,” and Sebastian, with the help of Michael Angelo,
painted the “Raising of Lazarus.” In 1520, before the picture was quite
finished, Raphael died. His favorite disciple, Giulio Romano, finished
the lower part of the picture (especially the demoniac) in the spirit of
Raphael, who had completed the upper portion and most of the lower.
III. LEGEND.
The Legend portrayed here—slightly varying from the one in the New
Testament, but not contradicting it—is as follows: Christ goes out with
his twelve disciples to Mount Tabor,(?) and, leaving the nine others at
the foot, ascends with the favored three to the summit, where the scene
of the Transfiguration takes place. While this transpires, the family
group approach with the demoniac, seeking help from a miraculous source.
Raphael has added to this legend the circumstance that two sympathetic
strangers, passing that way up the mount, carry to the Beatified One the
intelligence of the event below, and solicit his immediate and gracious
interference.
The Testament account leads us to suppose the scene to be Mount Tabor,
southeast of Nazareth, at whose base he had healed many, a few days
before, and where he had held many conversations with his disciples. “On
the following day, when they were come down, they met the family,” says
Luke; but Matthew and Mark do not fix so precisely the day.
IV. CHARACTERIZATION.
It may be safely affirmed that there is scarcely a picture in existence
in which the individualities are more strongly marked by internal
essential characteristics.
Above, there is no figure to be mistaken: Christ floats toward the
source of light—the Invisible Father, by whom _all_ is made visible that
is visible. On the right, Moses appears in strong contrast to Elias on
the left—the former the law-giver, and the latter the spontaneous,
fiery, eagle-eyed prophet.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account