The journal of the American-Irish Historical Society, Vol. II, 1899Various
History
The journal of the American-Irish Historical Society, Vol. II, 1899
Various
American-Irish Historical Society -- Periodicals; Ethnology -- United States -- Periodicals; Irish Americans -- Periodicals
In the first volume of the Journal of this Society, papers will be found
treating of the early history of the Irish settlers in New England, by
Messrs. Murray, Linehan, Smith, Brandon and Sheahan, members of our
Society, thus preserving in permanent form facts useful to the future
historian. The New England historian has never been noted for modesty in
claiming a full share of the glory of our country for New Englanders,
or, as he is prone to write it, descendants of the “Anglo-Saxon” race.
While honoring, as they deserve to be honored, the men of Boston and
Massachusetts who initiated the War of the Revolution, we are not
unmindful of what others have done to make our independence possible,
and to establish this form of government of ours, founded upon the
doctrine—not of the divine right of kings or of any other ruler, no
matter what he may call himself—to rule people, but the divine right of
the people to rule themselves, and lest we forget, in our hour of
conquest, let us recall again the doctrine of the founders of this
government: that all government ought to rest on the consent of the
governed. In establishing this government, the Irish element was a very
important factor. In the British House of Commons’ Report, fifth
session, fourteenth Parliament, Vol. xiii, page 303, we find the report
of an investigation of the causes of defeat in the war with the
colonies—the investigation was held in 1779—Major-General Robertson, who
had served twenty-four years in America, was asked: “How are the
provincial corps composed, mostly from native Americans, or from
emigrants from various nations of Europe?” He answered: “Some of the
corps mostly of natives, others, I believe the greatest number, are
enlisted from such people as can be got in the country, and many of them
may be emigrants. I remember General Lee telling me that he believed
half the rebel army were from Ireland.”
In Vol. xiii, British Commons’ Reports, page 431, Joseph Galloway, a
native of Pennsylvania, speaker of the assembly of the colony for twelve
years, and a delegate to the First Continental Congress, who became a
violent Tory in 1773, was examined for several days by members of the
House of Commons. Among the questions asked was: “That part of the rebel
army that enlisted in the service of congress, were they chiefly
composed of natives of America, or were the greater part of them
English, Scotch, or Irish?” Galloway answered: “The names and places of
their nativity being taken down, I can answer the question with
precision. There were scarcely one fourth natives of America, one half
Irish, the other fourth English and Scotch.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account