The journal of the American-Irish Historical Society, Vol. IX, 1910Various
History
The journal of the American-Irish Historical Society, Vol. IX, 1910
Various
American-Irish Historical Society -- Periodicals; Ethnology -- United States -- Periodicals; Irish Americans -- Periodicals
At this juncture, Cornwallis was the most conspicuous figure in the
British Army in America. Already “the pride and delight” of Lord George
Germain, his successes vindicated the opinion which that minister
entertained of his military talents, and he was now designed by the
Cabinet to supersede Clinton as commander-in-chief—being considered “the
one man on whom rested the hopes of the ministry for the successful
termination of the war.” Proud of this favoritism on the part of the
Cabinet and conscious of the hopes and expectations of the King,
Cornwallis began preparations for his northward march. Success had
elated him. He believed he would swing from victory unto victory until
he had brought all of the people south of the Delaware again under the
dominion of the crown.
He began the work of subjugation by inaugurating a reign of terror not
excelled in point of barbarity in the annals of civilized warfare. After
his victory at Camden, he erected a gibbet, and began the summary and
indiscriminate execution of those among his prisoners who had formerly
received their parole. He gave stringent orders to his subordinates to
imprison all who refused to enter the British Army and thus became the
instrument of their own subjection. The confiscation of property and the
destruction of life assumed hideous forms. “South Carolina,” says
Bancroft, “was writhing under the insolence of an army in which every
soldier was licensed to pillage, and every officer outlawed peaceful
citizens at will.” The gold and silver plate and other valuables divided
amongst the victors at the fall of Charleston amounted in value to a
million and a half dollars, the dividend of a major-general alone being
four thousand guineas. Cold-blooded assassinations by men holding the
King’s commission, often in the presence of the wives and children of
the helpless victims, were frequent. No engagements by capitulation were
respected. Woodsmen in their rude cabins were suddenly surrounded and
put to death, not because they were in arms against the King, but
because they were not in arms for him. The tomahawking in June, 1777, of
poor Jane McRae by one of the two Indians in the British service who
were escorting her under British protection from Fort Edward, New York,
to her expectant betrothed in the British lines, and who quarreled over
the reward promised for her safe arrival, found a fitting complement
three years later in South Carolina when Colonel Tarleton, of His
Majesty’s service, personally beat the wife of a general officer of the
Continental army because of his activity in the cause of his country.
Equalling this villainy, Lord Rawdon, one of Cornwallis’ commanders on
the Santee, who had found great difficulty in forcing his Irish Regiment
to fight against the American patriots, issued an order dated July 1,
1780, in which he said: “I will give the inhabitants ten guineas for any
deserter belonging to the volunteers of Ireland and five guineas only if
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account