The journal of the American-Irish Historical Society, Vol. IX, 1910Various
History
The journal of the American-Irish Historical Society, Vol. IX, 1910
Various
American-Irish Historical Society -- Periodicals; Ethnology -- United States -- Periodicals; Irish Americans -- Periodicals
Evidently the tide began to turn against titles, for Maclay records: “I
had a fine, slack and easy time of it today. Friends seemed to rise in
succession. Lee went over his old ground twice but owned, at last, that
there was difficulty every way but said plainly that the best mode for
the House was to adopt the [Senate] report—and then the other House
would follow. He found, however, the current began to turn against him
and he laid his head on his hands as if he would have slept.”
Finally Izard got up and said that he was in favor of a postponement. “I
could see the Vice-President kindle at him,” records Maclay. “Izard had
remarked that the House of Representatives had adopted the report
rejecting titles but the Chair interrupted him, saying: ‘No, we had no
right to know, nor could we know it until after the clerk had this
morning official information.’ The members fixed themselves and the
question was called for.”
XII.
“WHAT WILL THE COMMON PEOPLE SAY.”
At this point Adams got up and for forty minutes addressed the Senate.
Maclay writes: “He began first on the subject of order and found fault
with everything almost; but down he came to particulars and pointedly
blamed a member for disorderly behavior. The member had mentioned the
appearance of a captious disposition in the other House. This was
disorderly and he spoke with asperity. The member meant was Mr. Izard.
All this was prefatory. On he got to his favorite topic of titles and
over the old ground of the immense advantage of, the absolute necessity
of them. When he had exhausted this subject he turned a new leaf, I
believe, on the conviction that the postponement would be carried and,
perhaps, the business lost by an attention to the other House.
“‘Gentlemen’ [said Adams], I must tell you that it is you and the
President that have the making of titles. Suppose the President to have
the appointment of Mr. Jefferson at the court of France. Mr. Jefferson
is, in virtue of that appointment, the most illustrious, the most
powerful and what not. But the President must be himself something that
includes all the dignities of the diplomatic corps and something greater
still. What will the common people of foreign countries, what will the
sailors and the soldiers say, ‘George Washington, President of the
United States?’ They will despise him _to all eternity_. This is all
nonsense to the philosopher—but so is all government whatever.’
“The above I recollect with great precision; but he said fifty more
things equally injudicious which I do not think worth minuting. It is
evident that he begins to despair of getting the article of titles
through the House of Representatives and has turned his eye to get it
done solely by the Senate.”
XIII.
“HIGH-SOUNDING POMPOUS APPELLATION.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account