The Journal of the Debates in the Convention which Framed the Constitution of the United States, May-September 1787. Volume 1Madison, James
History
The Journal of the Debates in the Convention which Framed the Constitution of the United States, May-September 1787. Volume 1
Madison, James
Constitutional law -- United States; Constitutions -- United States; United States. Constitution
[58] "Mr. Dickinson has been famed through all America for his
Farmers Letters; he is a Scholar, and said to be a Man of
very extensive information. When I saw him in the Convention
I was induced to pay the greatest attention to him whenever
he spoke. I had often heard that he was a great Orator, but
I found him an indifferent Speaker. With an affected air of
wisdom he labors to produce a trifle,--his language is
irregular and incorrect,--his flourishes, (for he sometimes
attempts them,) are like expiring flames, they just shew
themselves and go out;--no traces of them are left on the
mind to chear or animate it. He is, however, a good writer
and will be ever considered one of the most important
characters in the United States. He is about 55 years old,
and was bred a Quaker."--Pierce's Notes, _Am. Hist. Rev._,
iii., 329.
M^r Bedford seconded the motion.
M^r Sherman contended that the national Legislature should have power to
remove the Executive at pleasure.
M^r Mason. Some mode of displacing an unfit magistrate is rendered
indispensable by the fallibility of those who choose, as well as by the
corruptibility of the man chosen. He opposed decidedly the making the
Executive the mere creature of the Legislature as a violation of the
fundamental principle of good Government.
M^r Madison & M^r Wilson observed that it would leave an equality of
agency in the small with the great States; that it would enable a
minority of the people to prevent y^e removal of an officer who had
rendered himself justly criminal in the eyes of a majority; that it
would open a door for intrigues ag^{st} him in States where his
administration tho' just might be unpopular, and might tempt him to pay
court to particular States whose leading partizans he might fear, or
wish to engage as his partizans. They both thought it bad policy to
introduce such a mixture of the State authorities, where their agency
could be otherwise supplied.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account