The Journal of the Debates in the Convention which Framed the Constitution of the United States, May-September 1787. Volume 2Madison, James
History
The Journal of the Debates in the Convention which Framed the Constitution of the United States, May-September 1787. Volume 2
Madison, James
Constitutional law -- United States; Constitutions -- United States; United States. Constitution
"... The President has been requested to write to the states
unrepresented, pressing upon them the objects which require
the attendance of their delegations, & urging them to come
forward, amongst the objects is that of the report of the
convention, which, it is supposed, is now in the State of
parturition--this bantling must receive the blessing of
Congress this session, or, I fear, it will expire before the
new one will assemble; every experiment has its critical
stages which must be taken as they occur, or the whole will
fail--the peoples expectations are rising with the progress
of this work, but will desert it, should it remain long with
Congress--permit me to suggest one idea as to the mode of
obtaining the accession of the States to the new plan of
government--let the convention appoint _one_ day, say the
1^{st} of May, upon which a convention appointed by the
people shall be held in each state, for the purpose of
accepting or rejecting in toto, the project--supposing an
act of the ordinary legislatures to be equally authentic,
which would not be true, yet many reasons present themselves
in favor of--special conventions--many men would be admitted
who are excluded from the legislatures--the business would
be taken up unclogged with any other--and it would
effectually call the attention of all the people to the
object as seriously affecting them. All the States being in
convention at the same time, opportunities of speculating
upon the views of each other would be cut off--the project
should be decided upon without an attempt to alter it--you
have doubtless found it difficult to reconcile the different
opinions in your body--will it not be impossible then, to
reconcile those which will arise amongst numerous assemblies
in the different states? It is possible there never may be a
general consent to the project as it goes out; but it is
absolutely certain there will never be an agreement in
amendments. It is the lot of but few to be able to discern
the remote principles upon which their happiness &
prosperity essentially depend--."--(Mad. MSS.)
MONDAY, AUG^{ST} 13. IN CONVENTION
Art. IV. Sect. 2. reconsidered--
M^r Wilson & M^r Randolph moved to strike out "7 years" and insert "4
years," as the requisite term of Citizenship to qualify for the House of
Rep^s. M^r Wilson said it was very proper the electors should govern
themselves by this consideration; but unnecessary & improper that the
Constitution should chain them down to it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account