The Journal of the Debates in the Convention which Framed the Constitution of the United States, May-September 1787. Volume 2Madison, James
History
The Journal of the Debates in the Convention which Framed the Constitution of the United States, May-September 1787. Volume 2
Madison, James
Constitutional law -- United States; Constitutions -- United States; United States. Constitution
M^r Wilson cited Pennsylv^a as a proof of the advantage of encouraging
emigrations. It was perhaps the youngest (except Georgia) settlem^t on
the Atlantic; yet it was at least among the foremost in population &
prosperity. He remarked that almost all the Gen^l officers of the Pen^a
line of the late army were foreigners. And no complaint had ever been
made against their fidelity or merit. Three of her deputies to the
Convention (M^r R. Morris, M^r Fitzsimons & himself) were also not
natives. He had no objection to Col. Hamilton's motion & would withdraw
the one made by himself.
M^r Butler was strenuous ag^{st} admitting foreigners into our public
Councils.
Question on Col. Hamilton's Motion
N. H. no. Mass. no. C^t ay. N. J. no. P^a ay. Del. no. Md. ay.
V^a ay. N. C. no. S. C. no. Geo. no.
Question on M^r Williamson's motion to insert 9 years instead of seven.
N. H. ay. Mass^{ts} no. C^t no. N. J. no. P^a no. Del. no.
M^d no. V^a no. N. C. no. S. C. ay. Geo. ay.
M^r Wilson renewed the motion for 4 years instead of 7; & on question
N. H. no. Mass. no. C^t ay. N. J. no. P^a no. Del. no. M^d ay.
V^a ay. N. C. no. S. C. no. Geo. no.
M^r Gov^r Morris moved to add to the end of the section (Art IV. S. 2) a
proviso that the limitation of seven years should not affect the rights
of any person now a Citizen.
M^r Mercer 2^{ded} the motion. It was necessary he said to prevent a
disfranchisement of persons who had become Citizens under and on the
faith & according to the laws & Constitution from being on a level in
all respects with natives.
M^r Rutlidge. It might as well be said that all qualifications are
disfranchisem^{ts} and that to require the age of 25 years was a
disfranchisement. The policy of the precaution was as great with regard
to foreigners now Citizens; as to those who are to be naturalized in
future.
M^r Sherman. The U. States have not invited foreigners nor pledged their
faith that they should enjoy equal privileges with native Citizens. The
Individual States alone have done this. The former therefore are at
liberty to make any discriminations they may judge requisite.
M^r Ghorum. When foreigners are naturalized it w^d seem as if they stand
on an equal footing with natives. He doubted then the propriety of
giving a retrospective force to the restriction.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account