The Journal of the Debates in the Convention which Framed the Constitution of the United States, May-September 1787. Volume 2Madison, James
History
The Journal of the Debates in the Convention which Framed the Constitution of the United States, May-September 1787. Volume 2
Madison, James
Constitutional law -- United States; Constitutions -- United States; United States. Constitution
M^r Broome seconded him.
M^r Ghorum. this would be unreasonable. The Senate will be detained
longer from home, will be obliged to remove their families, and in time
of war perhaps to sit constantly. Their allowance should certainly be
higher. The members of the Senates in the States are allowed more, than
those of the other house.
M^r Dickenson withdrew his motion.
It was moved & agreed to amend the section by adding--"to be ascertained
by law."
The section (Art. VI. Sect. 10) as amended, agreed to nem. con.
Adj^d.
WEDNESDAY AUGUST 15. IN CONVENTION.
Art: VI. Sect. 11. Agreed to nem. con.
Art: VI. Sect 12. taken up.
M^r Strong moved to amend the article so as to read--"Each House shall
possess the right of originating all bills, except bills for raising
money for the purposes of revenue, or for appropriating the same and for
fixing the salaries of the officers of the Gov^t which shall originate
in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur
with amendments as in other cases".
Col. Mason, 2^{ds} the motion. He was extremely earnest to take this
power from the Senate, who he said could already sell the whole Country
by means of Treaties.
M^r Ghorum urged the amendment as of great importance. The Senate will
first acquire the habit of preparing money bills, and then the practice
will grow into an exclusive right of preparing them.
M^r Govern^r Morris opposed it as unnecessary and inconvenient.
M^r Williamson, some think this restriction on the Senate essential to
liberty, others think it of no importance. Why should not the former be
indulged. He was for an efficient and stable Gov^t: but many would not
strengthen the Senate if not restricted in the case of money bills. The
friends of the Senate would therefore lose more than they would gain by
refusing to gratify the other side. He moved to postpone the subject
till the powers of the Senate should be gone over.
M^r Rutlidge 2^{ds} the motion.
M^r Mercer should hereafter be ag^{st} returning to a reconsideration of
this section. He contended (alluding to M^r Mason's observations) that
the Senate ought not to have the power of treaties. This power belonged
to the Executive department; adding that Treaties would not be final so
as to alter the laws of the land, till ratified by legislative
authority. This was the case of Treaties in Great Britain; particularly
the late Treaty of Co[~m]erce with France.
Col. Mason, did not say that a Treaty would repeal a law; but that the
Senate by means of treaty might alienate territory &c., without
legislative sanction. The cessions of the British Islands in W. Indies
by Treaty alone were an example. If Spain should possess herself of
Georgia therefore the Senate might by treaty dismember the Union. He
wished the motion to be decided now, that the friends of it might know
how to conduct themselves.
On the question for postponing Sect: 12. it passed in the affirmative.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account